Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277300›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2021

Botulinum Neurotoxins: Mechanism of Action.

O Rossetto, M Pirazzini, F Fabris, C Montecucco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
48.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Repetitive nerve stimulation findings in iatrogenic botulism compared with myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Typing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O RossettoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
M PirazziniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
F FabrisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
C MontecuccoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. cesare.montecucco@gmail.com.
University of Padua · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are a growing family of bacterial protein toxins that cause botulism, a rare but often fatal animal and human disease. They are the most potent toxins known owing to their molecular architecture, which underlies their mechanism of action. BoNTs target peripheral nerve terminals by a unique mode of binding and enter into their cytosol where they cleave SNARE proteins, thus inhibiting the neurotransmitter release. The specificity and rapidity of binding, which limits the anatomical area of its neuroparalytic action, and its reversible action make BoNT a valuable pharmaceutical to treat neurological and non-neurological diseases determined by hyperactivity of cholinergic nerve terminals. This review reports the progress on our understanding of how BoNTs cause nerve paralysis highlighting the different steps of their molecular mechanism of action as key aspects to explain their extreme toxicity but also their unique pharmacological properties.

Indexed as

BotulismNeurotoxinsAnimalsHumansParalysisSynaptic TransmissionNeurotoxinsBotulinum neurotoxinsBotulismNeuromuscular junctionNeuroparalysis

Identifiers

PMID32277300
OpenAlexW3015201151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.