Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277268›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ mobility after treatment for uterine descent: differences between surgical procedures.

Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden, Pauline Lecomte-Grosbras, Jean-François Witz, Mathias Brieu, Michel Cosson, Hugo W F van Eijndhoven

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Middle Compartment Defect].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying displacement of urogenital organs after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mèlanie N van IJsselmuidenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Zwolle, PO Box 10500, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands. m.n.van.ijsselmuiden@isala.nl.
Pauline Lecomte-GrosbrasUniv. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, FRE 2016-LamCube-Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, 59000, Lille, France.
Jean-François WitzUniv. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, FRE 2016-LamCube-Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, 59000, Lille, France.
Mathias BrieuUniv. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, FRE 2016-LamCube-Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, 59000, Lille, France.
Michel CossonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeanne de Flandre hospital, Lille, France.
Hugo W F van EijndhovenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Zwolle, PO Box 10500, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Isala · NLLaboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, MultiéchelleHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ mobility is defined as the displacement of pelvic organs between rest and maximal straining. We hypothesized that pelvic organ mobility after vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) might be increased compared with other surgeries for uterine descent, which may contribute to the high occurrence of postoperative cystocele after this surgery. Pelvic organ mobility and the vaginal axes after SSHP are compared with other surgical procedures for uterine descent: vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension (VH) and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH).

methodsIn this prospective pilot study, 15 women were included (5 for each procedure). Six months postoperatively, POP-Q examination and dynamic MRI were performed and questionnaires were filled out regarding prolapse complaints. Pelvic organ mobility on MRI was defined as vertical displacement of pelvic organs at rest and maximal straining. The displacements and angles were measured using an image registration method. Furthermore, the angle of displacement of cervix/vaginal vault and vaginal axes were assessed.

resultsNo anatomical recurrences of pelvic organ prolapse were found. No difference in pelvic organ mobility was demonstrated. After VH, a more posterior position of the upper vagina was found compared with SSHP and LSH.

conclusionsBased on these data, the higher recurrence risk in the anterior compartment after SSHP cannot be explained. Larger sample sizes, studying women with recurrence or de novo cystocele after SSHP or using an upright MRI scanner would be of interest to further assess the relationship between pelvic organ mobility and the occurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMRIPelvic organ mobilityPelvic organ prolapseUterine prolapse

Identifiers

PMID32277268
OpenAlexW3015450167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.