ArticleScientific reports2020
Initial Report: A Novel Intraoperative Navigation System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using Real-Time Virtual Sonography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual marker-based augmented reality for intraoperative ultrasound in minimally invasive surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- History of liver surgery.Clinical liver diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent progress in navigation has revealed problems involving non-rigid registration for hepatic surgery. With the increasing popularity of laparoscopic liver surgery, a new laparoscopic navigation system is necessary. This study involved an in-vitro demonstration of a 3-dimensional printer model and in vivo demonstration in four patients. For the in vitro examination, a position detecting unit attached at 33 cm and 13 cm distance conditions from the tip of the electrocautery was examined eight times at the marked points on the liver surface eight times respectively. The differences between the simulation and the authentic dissecting plane were conventionally investigated in vivo. In vitro, the errors of the 33 cm and 13 cm distance model were7.8 ± 3.5 mm (mean ± SD), and 3.3 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. The mean differences of the dissection plane were within 10 mm. The potentiality and safety of the novel navigation system was confirmed, although further investigation is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.