Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32276973›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

Respiratory and Gut Microbiota in Commercial Turkey Flocks with Disparate Weight Gain Trajectories Display Differential Compositional Dynamics.

Kara J M Taylor, John M Ngunjiri, Michael C Abundo, Hyesun Jang, Mohamed Elaish, Amir Ghorbani, Mahesh Kc, Bonnie P Weber, Timothy J Johnson, Chang-Won Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bacterial communities along parrot digestive and respiratory tracts: the effects of sample type, species and time.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Live Bacterial Prophylactics in Modern Poultry.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kara J M Taylor *Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
John M Ngunjiri *Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-1698
Michael C AbundoFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Hyesun JangFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Mohamed ElaishFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Amir GhorbaniFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Mahesh KcFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
Bonnie P WeberDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Timothy J JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Chang-Won LeeFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA lee.2854@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communities of gut bacteria (microbiota) are known to play roles in resistance to pathogen infection and optimal weight gain in turkey flocks. However, knowledge of turkey respiratory microbiota and its link to gut microbiota is lacking. This study presents a 16S rRNA gene-based census of the turkey respiratory microbiota (nasal cavity and trachea) alongside gut microbiota (cecum and ileum) in two identical commercial Hybrid Converter turkey flocks raised in parallel under typical field commercial conditions. The flocks were housed in adjacent barns during the brood stage and in geographically separated farms during the grow-out stage. Several bacterial taxa, primarily

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWeight GainAnimalsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBody-Weight TrajectoryCecumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumMaleNasal CavityTracheaTurkeyscommercial turkeymicrobiometurkey gut microbiotaturkey respiratory microbiota

Identifiers

PMID32276973
PMCPMC7267191
OpenAlexW3015565204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.