Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32276670›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2020

Scoring pleurisy in slaughtered pigs using convolutional neural networks.

Abigail R Trachtman, Luca Bergamini, Andrea Palazzi, Angelo Porrello, Andrea Capobianco Dondona, Ercole Del Negro, Andrea Paolini, Giorgio Vignola, Simone Calderara, Giuseppe Marruchella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Welfare of calves.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Welfare of pigs on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail R TrachtmanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Luca BergaminiAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Andrea PalazziAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Angelo PorrelloAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Andrea Capobianco DondonaFarm4Trade s.r.l., Via Marino Turchi, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Ercole Del NegroAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Andrea PaoliniFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Giorgio VignolaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Simone CalderaraAImageLab, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli 10/1, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Giuseppe MarruchellaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy. gmarruchella@unite.it.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diseases of the respiratory system are known to negatively impact the profitability of the pig industry, worldwide. Considering the relatively short lifespan of pigs, lesions can be still evident at slaughter, where they can be usefully recorded and scored. Therefore, the slaughterhouse represents a key check-point to assess the health status of pigs, providing unique and valuable feedback to the farm, as well as an important source of data for epidemiological studies. Although relevant, scoring lesions in slaughtered pigs represents a very time-consuming and costly activity, thus making difficult their systematic recording. The present study has been carried out to train a convolutional neural network-based system to automatically score pleurisy in slaughtered pigs. The automation of such a process would be extremely helpful to enable a systematic examination of all slaughtered livestock. Overall, our data indicate that the proposed system is well able to differentiate half carcasses affected with pleurisy from healthy ones, with an overall accuracy of 85.5%. The system was better able to recognize severely affected half carcasses as compared with those showing less severe lesions. The training of convolutional neural networks to identify and score pneumonia, on the one hand, and the achievement of trials in large capacity slaughterhouses, on the other, represent the natural pursuance of the present study. As a result, convolutional neural network-based technologies could provide a fast and cheap tool to systematically record lesions in slaughtered pigs, thus supplying an enormous amount of useful data to all stakeholders in the pig industry.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAbattoirsAnimalsPleurisyPneumoniaSus scrofaSwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID32276670
PMCPMC7149908
OpenAlexW3015431329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.