Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32276585›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Indoor residual spraying for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa 1997 to 2017: an adjusted retrospective analysis.

Julie-Anne A Tangena, Chantal M J Hendriks, Maria Devine, Meghan Tammaro, Anna E Trett, Ignatius Williams, Adilson José DePina, Achamylesh Sisay, Ramandimbiarijaona Herizo, Hmooda Toto Kafy and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Julie-Anne A TangenaVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. jtangena@gmail.com.
Chantal M J HendriksBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Maria DevineBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Meghan TammaroPresident's Malaria Initiative Africa Indoor Residual Spraying Project, Abt Associates, 6130 Executive Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
Anna E TrettVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Ignatius WilliamsMonitoring, & Evaluation Department, AngloGold Ashanti Malaria Limited, AO0540595 Obuasi Mine Road, P. O. Box 10, Obuasi, Ghana.
Adilson José DePinaMalaria Pre-Elimination Program, CCS-SIDA/MSSS, Avenida Cidade Lisboa, "Prédio Bô Casa" 1º Andar, CP, 855, Praia, Cabo Verde.
Achamylesh SisayFederal Ministry of Health (FMoH), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ramandimbiarijaona HerizoProgramme national de lutte contre le paludisme, Androhibe en face ENAM, BP 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Hmooda Toto KafyIntegrated Vector Management Department, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Elizabeth ChizemaNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Chainama Hills Hospital Grounds, Lusaka, Zambia.
Allan WerePresident's Malaria Initiative Africa Indoor Residual Spraying Project, Abt Associates, 6130 Executive Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
Jennifer RozierBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Michael ColemanVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Catherine L MoyesBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. catherinemoyes@gmail.com.
University of Oxford · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBAbt Global (United States) · USÉcole Nationale d'Administration de Madagascar · MGFederal Ministry of Health · SDFederal Ministry of Health · ETGhana Health Service · GHMinistério da Saúde e da Segurança Social · CVNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZM

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108440/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndoor residual spraying (IRS) is a key tool for controlling and eliminating malaria by targeting vectors. To support the development of effective intervention strategies it is important to understand the impact of vector control tools on malaria incidence and on the spread of insecticide resistance. In 2006, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that countries should report on coverage and impact of IRS, yet IRS coverage data are still sparse and unspecific. Here, the subnational coverage of IRS across sub-Saharan Africa for the four main insecticide classes from 1997 to 2017 were estimated.

methodsData on IRS deployment were collated from a variety of sources, including the President's Malaria Initiative spray reports and National Malaria Control Programme reports, for all 46 malaria-endemic countries in sub-Saharan Africa from 1997 to 2017. The data were mapped to the applicable administrative divisions and the proportion of households sprayed for each of the four main insecticide classes; carbamates, organochlorines, organophosphates and pyrethroids was calculated.

resultsThe number of countries implementing IRS increased considerably over time, although the focal nature of deployment means the number of people protected remains low. From 1997 to 2010, DDT and pyrethroids were commonly used, then partly replaced by carbamates from 2011 and by organophosphates from 2013. IRS deployment since the publication of resistance management guidelines has typically avoided overlap between pyrethroid IRS and ITN use. However, annual rotations of insecticide classes with differing modes of action are not routinely used.

conclusionThis study highlights the gaps between policy and practice, emphasizing the continuing potential of IRS to drive resistance. The data presented here can improve studies on the impact of IRS on malaria incidence and help to guide future malaria control efforts.

Indexed as

Mosquito ControlAfrica South of the SaharaCommunicable Disease ControlInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesMalariaRetrospective StudiesInsecticidesCarbamatesIndoor residual sprayingMalaria controlOrganochlorinesOrganophosphatesPyrethroids

Identifiers

PMID32276585
PMCPMC7149868
OpenAlexW3015658120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.