Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32276412›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Bone Metabolism and Vitamin D Implication in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Barbara Altieri, Carla Di Dato, Roberta Modica, Filomena Bottiglieri, Antonella Di Sarno, James F H Pittaway, Chiara Martini, Antongiulio Faggiano, Annamaria Colao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara AltieriDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-3249
Carla Di DatoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Roberta ModicaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Filomena BottiglieriDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonella Di SarnoUOC of Internal Medicine, AO dei Colli, Monaldi Unit, 80131 Naples, Italy.
James F H PittawayCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ London, UK.
Chiara MartiniClinica Medica 3, Department of Medicine, DIMED, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Antongiulio FaggianoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-3946
Annamaria ColaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITQueen Mary University of London · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S022155/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients affected by gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have an increased risk of developing osteopenia and osteoporosis, as several factors impact on bone metabolism in these patients. In fact, besides the direct effect of bone metastasis, bone health can be affected by hormone hypersecretion (including serotonin, cortisol, and parathyroid hormone-related protein), specific microRNAs, nutritional status (which in turn could be affected by medical and surgical treatments), and vitamin D deficiency. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), a hereditary syndrome associated with NET occurrence, bone damage may carry other consequences. Osteoporosis may negatively impact on the quality of life of these patients and can increment the cost of medical care since these patients usually live with their disease for a long time. However, recommendations suggesting screening to assess bone health in GEP-NET patients are missing. The aim of this review is to critically analyze evidence on the mechanisms that could have a potential impact on bone health in patients affected by GEP-NET, focusing on vitamin D and its role in GEP-NET, as well as on factors associated with MEN1 that could have an impact on bone homeostasis.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusBone and BonesBone DensityBone Diseases, MetabolicBone RemodelingHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMicroRNAsMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroendocrine TumorsOsteoporosisPancreatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyMicroRNAsVitamin DbonecortisolMEN1mineral bone densitymiRNAneuroendocrine tumorosteoporosisserotonintherapyvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32276412
PMCPMC7230756
OpenAlexW3016145465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.