ArticleBiomaterials2020
Decoupling the effects of nanopore size and surface roughness on the attachment, spreading and differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells.
Article in Biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micellar LYTAC-engineered bionic coatings abrogate RANK-dependent osteocatabolism and boost fibrillogenesis-mimetic mineral accretion for empowering osteoporotic osseointegration.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Electrosprayed Chitosan-Calcium Phosphate Microshell Composite Coatings on Silanized Titanium Substrates.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Polycatecholamine nanocoatings on stainless steel: the effect on attachment of human fibroblasts and platelets.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Interface-Mediated Neurogenic Signaling: The Impact of Surface Geometry and Chemistry on Neural Cell Behavior for Regenerative and Brain-Machine Interfacing Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Induced Formation of Plasma Membrane Protrusions with Porous Materials as Instructive Surfaces.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A facile nanopattern modification of silk fibroin electrospun scaffold and the corresponding impact on cell proliferation and osteogenesis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on two types of commercial dermal scaffolds: An in vitro study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2024Article
- Unusual effects of a nanoporous gold substrate on cell adhesion and differentiation because of independent multi-branch signaling of focal adhesions.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2023Article
- Stimulating factors for regulation of osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2023Review
- Effects of Allogeneic Bone Substitute Configurations on Cell Adhesion Process In Vitro.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Osteogenic and anti-inflammatory effect of the multifunctional bionic hydrogel scaffold loaded with aspirin and nano-hydroxyapatite.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Study on the influence of scaffold morphology and structure on osteogenic performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Analysis of disordered abrasive scratches on titanium surfaces and their impact on nuclear translocation of yes-associated protein.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Performance of Nonwoven PLLA Scaffolds of Different Thickness for Stem Cells Seeding and Implantation.Polymers · 2022Article
- Regulation of cell attachment, spreading, and migration by hydrogel substrates with independently tunable mesh size.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Effect of microtopography on osseointegration of implantable biomaterials and its modification strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Enhanced Attachment and Collagen Type I Deposition of MC3T3-E1 Cells via Electrohydrodynamic Printed Sub-Microscale Fibrous Architectures.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Effect of Controlled Microtopography on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Review
- Facile surface functional polyetheretherketone with antibacterial and immunoregulatory activities for enhanced regeneration toward bacterium-infected bone destruction.Drug delivery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nanopore size and roughness of nanoporous surface are two critical variables in determining stem cell fate, but little is known about the contribution from each cue individually. To address this gap, we use two-dimensional nanoporous membranes with controlled nanopore size and roughness to culture bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), and study their behaviors such as attachment, spreading and differentiation. We find that increasing the roughness of nanoporous surface has no noticeable effect on cell attachment, and only slightly decreases cell spreading areas and inhibits osteogenic differentiation. However, BMSCs cultured on membranes with larger nanopores have significantly fewer attached cells and larger spreading areas. Moreover, these cells cultured on larger nanopores undergo enhanced osteogenic differentiation by expressing more alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, osteopontin, and secreting more collagen type I. These results suggest that although both nanopore size and roughness can affect BMSCs, nanopore size plays a more significant role than roughness in controlling BMSC behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.