ArticleTheoretical population biology2020
Assortative mating by population of origin in a mechanistic model of admixture.
Article in Theoretical population biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The paradoxical extinction: Exploring signatures of assortative mating as a possible mechanism that maintains canonical Red Wolf genetic ancestry in the American Gulf Coast canids.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- Nested Admixture During and After the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade on the Island of São Tomé.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.Genetics · 2025Article
- Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Counting the genetic ancestors from source populations in members of an admixed population.Genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- On the number of genealogical ancestors tracing to the source groups of an admixed population.Genetics · 2023Article
- Challenges of accurately estimating sex-biased admixture from X chromosomal and autosomal ancestry proportions.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Sex-biased admixture and assortative mating shape genetic variation and influence demographic inference in admixed Cabo Verdeans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Human genetic admixture through the lens of population genomics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?Biology letters · 2021Review
- Skin deep: The decoupling of genetic admixture levels from phenotypes that differed between source populations.American journal of physical anthropology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Populations whose mating pairs have levels of similarity in phenotypes or genotypes that differ systematically from the level expected under random mating are described as experiencing assortative mating. Excess similarity in mating pairs is termed positive assortative mating, and excess dissimilarity is negative assortative mating. In humans, empirical studies suggest that mating pairs from various admixed populations - whose ancestry derives from two or more source populations - possess correlated ancestry components that indicate the occurrence of positive assortative mating on the basis of ancestry. Generalizing a two-sex mechanistic admixture model, we devise a model of one form of ancestry-assortative mating that occurs through preferential mating based on source population. Under the model, we study the moments of the admixture fraction distribution for different assumptions about mating preferences, including both positive and negative assortative mating by population. We demonstrate that whereas the mean admixture under assortative mating is equivalent to that of a corresponding randomly mating population, the variance of admixture depends on the level and direction of assortative mating. We consider two special cases of assortative mating by population: first, a single admixture event, and second, constant contributions to the admixed population over time. In contrast to standard settings in which positive assortment increases variation within a population, certain assortative mating scenarios allow the variance of admixture to decrease relative to a corresponding randomly mating population: with the three populations we consider, the variance-increasing effect of positive assortative mating within a population might be overwhelmed by a variance-decreasing effect emerging from mating preferences involving other pairs of populations. The effect of assortative mating is smaller on the X chromosome than on the autosomes because inheritance of the X in males depends only on the mother's ancestry, not on the mating pair. Because the variance of admixture is informative about the timing of admixture and possibly about sex-biased admixture contributions, the effects of assortative mating are important to consider in inferring features of population history from distributions of admixture values. Our model provides a framework to quantitatively study assortative mating under flexible scenarios of admixture over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.