Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32275841›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2020

Gain of function mutant p53 protein activates AKT through the Rac1 signaling to promote tumorigenesis.

Xuetian Yue, Fangnan Wu, Yanchen Li, Juan Liu, Michael Boateng, Kranthi Mandava, Cen Zhang, Zhaohui Feng, Jimin Gao, Wenwei Hu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mutant p53Molecular oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. RHO GTPase family in hepatocellular carcinoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuetian YueRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Fangnan WuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Technology & Application of Model Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanchen LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Technology & Application of Model Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Juan LiuRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Michael BoatengRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Kranthi MandavaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Cen ZhangRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Zhaohui FengRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jimin GaoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Technology & Application of Model Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenwei HuRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USWenzhou Medical University · CNJohnson University · USShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor suppressor p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. Mutant p53 (mutp53) not only loses the tumor suppressive activity of wild type p53, but often gains new oncogenic activities to promote tumorigenesis, defined as mutp53 gain of function (GOF). While the concept of mutp53 GOF is well-established, its underlying mechanism is not well-understood. AKT has been suggested to be activated by mutp53 and contribute to mutp53 GOF, but its underlying mechanism is unclear. In this study, we found that the activation of the Rac1 signaling by mutp53 mediates the promoting effect of mutp53 on AKT activation. Blocking Rac1 signaling by RNAi or a Rac1 inhibitor can inhibit AKT activation by mutp53. Importantly, targeting Rac1/AKT can greatly compromise mutp53 GOF in tumorigenesis. Results from this study uncover a new mechanism for AKT activation in tumors, and reveal that activation of AKT by mutp53

Indexed as

Signal TransductionBreast NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationCohort StudiesEnzyme ActivationFemaleGain of Function MutationHumansMutant ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktrac1 GTP-Binding Proteinras GTPase-Activating ProteinsSumoylationDAB2IP protein, humanMutant ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktrac1 GTP-Binding Proteinras GTPase-Activating ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53AKTgain of functionMutant p53Rac1tumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID32275841
PMCPMC7469461
OpenAlexW3015293879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.