ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
A powerful and versatile colocalization test.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Omic Mosaic Model of Acetaminophen Induced Alanine Aminotransferase Elevation.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023Trial
- Causal Links of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Complications With Cortical Modification: A Mendelian Randomization and Mediation Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Interactive Effect of Plasma Lipidome on Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- An evolving understanding of multiple causal variants underlying genetic association signals.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- A scoping review of statistical methods to investigate colocalization between genetic associations and microRNA expression in osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024Article
- Circulating insulin-like growth factors and risks of overall, aggressive and early-onset prostate cancer: a collaborative analysis of 20 prospective studies and Mendelian randomization analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Redefining tissue specificity of genetic regulation of gene expression in the presence of allelic heterogeneity.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- A more accurate method for colocalisation analysis allowing for multiple causal variants.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Shared associations identify causal relationships between gene expression and immune cell phenotypes.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Performing post-genome-wide association study analysis: overview, challenges and recommendations.F1000Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS and PrediXcan) have been increasingly applied to detect associations between genetically predicted gene expressions and GWAS traits, which may suggest, however do not completely determine, causal genes for GWAS traits, due to the likely violation of their imposed strong assumptions for causal inference. Testing colocalization moves it closer to establishing causal relationships: if a GWAS trait and a gene's expression share the same associated SNP, it may suggest a regulatory (and thus putative causal) role of the SNP mediated through the gene on the GWAS trait. Accordingly, it is of interest to develop and apply various colocalization testing approaches. The existing approaches may each have some severe limitations. For instance, some methods test the null hypothesis that there is colocalization, which is not ideal because often the null hypothesis cannot be rejected simply due to limited statistical power (with too small sample sizes). Some other methods arbitrarily restrict the maximum number of causal SNPs in a locus, which may lead to loss of power in the presence of wide-spread allelic heterogeneity. Importantly, most methods cannot be applied to either GWAS/eQTL summary statistics or cases with more than two possibly correlated traits. Here we present a simple and general approach based on conditional analysis of a locus on multiple traits, overcoming the above and other shortcomings of the existing methods. We demonstrate that, compared with other methods, our new method can be applied to a wider range of scenarios and often perform better. We showcase its applications to both simulated and real data, including a large-scale Alzheimer's disease GWAS summary dataset and a gene expression dataset, and a large-scale blood lipid GWAS summary association dataset. An R package "jointsum" implementing the proposed method is publicly available at github.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.