Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32275587›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020

ANHIR: Automatic Non-Rigid Histological Image Registration Challenge.

Jiri Borovec, Jan Kybic, Ignacio Arganda-Carreras, Dmitry V Sorokin, Gloria Bueno, Alexander V Khvostikov, Spyridon Bakas, Eric I-Chao Chang, Stefan Heldmann, Kimmo Kartasalo and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Jiri Borovec
Jan Kybic
Ignacio Arganda-Carreras
Dmitry V Sorokin
Gloria Bueno
Alexander V Khvostikov
Spyridon Bakas
Eric I-Chao Chang
Stefan Heldmann
Kimmo Kartasalo
Leena Latonen
Johannes Lotz
Michelle Noga
Sarthak Pati
Kumaradevan Punithakumar
Pekka Ruusuvuori
Andrzej Skalski
Nazanin Tahmasebi
Masi Valkonen
Ludovic Venet
Yizhe Wang
Nick Weiss
Marek Wodzinski
Yu Xiang
Yan Xu
Yan Yan
Paul Yushkevich
Shengyu Zhao
Arrate Munoz-Barrutia

Funding

UPenn ADCC Biomarker CoreP30AG010124 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI XIE, SHARON XIANGWEN · 1991 to 2020
$35.1M
Ex Vivo Imaging of the Aging Brain to Discover Morphology/Pathology AssociationsR01AG056014 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A. Yushkevich · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Cancer imaging phenomics software suite: application to brain and breast cancerU24CA189523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
Adaptive Large-Scale Framework for Automatic Biomedical Image SegmentationR01EB017255 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA189523NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010124NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056014NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017255NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic Non-rigid Histological Image Registration (ANHIR) challenge was organized to compare the performance of image registration algorithms on several kinds of microscopy histology images in a fair and independent manner. We have assembled 8 datasets, containing 355 images with 18 different stains, resulting in 481 image pairs to be registered. Registration accuracy was evaluated using manually placed landmarks. In total, 256 teams registered for the challenge, 10 submitted the results, and 6 participated in the workshop. Here, we present the results of 7 well-performing methods from the challenge together with 6 well-known existing methods. The best methods used coarse but robust initial alignment, followed by non-rigid registration, used multiresolution, and were carefully tuned for the data at hand. They outperformed off-the-shelf methods, mostly by being more robust. The best methods could successfully register over 98% of all landmarks and their mean landmark registration accuracy (TRE) was 0.44% of the image diagonal. The challenge remains open to submissions and all images are available for download.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHistological Techniques

Identifiers

PMID32275587
PMCPMC7584382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.