ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2020
Diagnosing tooth wear, a new taxonomy based on the revised version of the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES 2.0).
Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05791175 (Stress and Tooth Structure Loss in Dental Students. A Prospective, Longitudinal Pilot - Observational Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stress and Tooth Structure Loss in Dental Students. A Prospective, Longitudinal Pilot - Observational Study.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach for Determining the Risk of Temporomandibular Disorders.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Factors associated with tooth wear in a Swedish adult population: a cross‑sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Digital Visual Assessment of Tooth Wear: Practical Comparison of BEWE, Simplified TWI and TWES 2.0 on Intraoral Scans with Exploratory Sex-Stratified Observations.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect of preparation design on the fracture behavior of 3D-printed restorations in an in-vitro tooth wear model.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary data evaluation of the Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB) and BruxScreen in Turkey.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Two-Body Wear of Nanocomposites With Different Filler Morphology and Composition Using White-Light Interferometry.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A reliability assessment of the basic erosive wear examination and the tooth wear evaluation system 2.0 utilizing intraoral scan data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Restoring Severe Adult Tooth Wear Through Interdisciplinary Approach: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Innovative dentifrices based on bioactive silica for enamel remineralization and erosion control: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Salivary Characteristics and Other Risk Factors Associated with the Severity of Chemical and Mechanical Tooth Wear in At-Risk Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The BruxChecker System for Quantitatively Assessing Sleep Bruxism at the Dental Level: Reliability, Reference Values and Methodological Considerations.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Tooth Wear Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors Among a Small Portuguese Community: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of probable bruxism on the oral health-related quality of life among police officers and their relatives.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Reliability of the Assessment of Tooth Wear Severity on Dental Hard Tissues and Dental Restorations, Using the TWES 2.0, by Nonexperts.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Effect of regenerating toothpastes on abrasion of eroded enamel and dentin: An in vitro study.JADA foundational science · 2025Article
- Establishment and evaluation of a deep learning-based tooth wear severity grading system using intraoral photographs.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Assessing the relationship between incisor wear, age, and body condition in Dohne Merino ewes (Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and risk indicators of dental wear in a Saudi subpopulation.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTooth wear is a multifactorial condition, leading to the loss of dental hard tissues. Physiological tooth wear is a slow process that normally does not lead to any subjective symptoms. When the condition progresses, it can become pathological, and several signs and symptoms may occur. The Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES) was described to implement a systematic diagnostic and management approach. Recently, management guidelines were presented in a European Consensus Statement (ECS) as well.
objectivesTo evaluate the TWES in practice and to integrate the principles described in the ECS in order to compose a renewed TWES 2.0 and a new taxonomy.
methodsThe TWES and the recommendations of the ECS were used by dental clinicians, in order to test its applicability in practice.
resultsAgreement was reached that the TWES 2.0 will use a stepwise approach, with a straightforward Tooth Wear Screening part and a more detailed Tooth Wear Status part. Also, the assessment of pathology from the ECS is incorporated in the TWES 2.0 (both classification and taxonomy).
conclusionsIn the TWES 2.0 is described that tooth wear is pathological if moderate/severe/extreme tooth wear is present, in combination with one or several described signs and symptoms. Aetiology can be assessed by findings that indicate a chemical and/or a mechanical cause. The taxonomy may help to identify situations in which preventive (restorative) interventions in early stages of tooth wear can be indicated. The reliability and validity of the adapted parts must be proven.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.