Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32274742›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2020

An Exploration of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Initiation Among Women Who Inject Drugs.

Marisa Felsher, Eliza Ziegler, Laramie R Smith, Susan G Sherman, K Rivet Amico, Rachel Fox, Kayla Madden, Alexis M Roth

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06025435 (SAIA-SSP-HIV), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06025435 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

SAIA-SSP-HIV: a Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach to Optimizing HIV Service Delivery in Syringe Services Programs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2023 to 2027Enrolled32ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsSAIA-HIV-SSP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marisa FelsherDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St., Room 454, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Eliza ZieglerDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Laramie R SmithDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Susan G ShermanDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
K Rivet AmicoDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rachel FoxPublic Health Management Corporation Care Clinic, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kayla MaddenPrevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexis M RothDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St., Room 454, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. alexisroth@drexel.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-7136

Funding

Packaging Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) to Prevent HIV Transmission among Women who Inject DrugsR21DA043417 · NIDA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI ROTH, ALEXIS MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$442k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA043417-01A1NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective but understudied tool for preventing HIV among women who inject drugs (WWID). This article is the first to explore WWID's rationale for PrEP initiation (or refusal) in a real-world setting. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 25 WWID, participating in a PrEP demonstration project operating within a syringe services program, based on whether they initiated or declined PrEP care. Content analysis of qualitative interviews was used to explore decisions to initiate PrEP (or not). We found that WWID view HIV as severe, perceive themselves to be susceptible to HIV, and believe PrEP is beneficial for HIV prevention. For some, however, real and perceived barriers outweighed benefits, leading to decisions not to initiate PrEP. Barriers included HIV stigma, fear of side effects, and needing assurance that PrEP care will be available long-term. Despite viewing PrEP as an important HIV prevention tool, not all WWID who were offered PrEP initiated it. For these women, supports to buffer perceived barriers to initiation and access to post-exposure prophylaxis may be warranted. For women who initiate, it is possible that adherence will wane if perceived risk does not remain high. Research to understand PrEP persistence is needed.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance Abuse, IntravenousHealth belief modelHIVPre-exposure prophylaxisWomen who inject drugs

Identifiers

PMID32274742
PMCPMC7773227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.