Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32274579›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2021

Novel Native and Engineered Botulinum Neurotoxins.

Lance Steward, Mitchell F Brin, Amy Brideau-Andersen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. XeominToxins · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Making the cut with protease engineering.Cell chemical biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lance StewardAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Mitchell F BrinAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Amy Brideau-AndersenAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA. Brideau-andersen_Amy@Allergan.com.
Allergan (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), produced by Clostridia and other bacteria, are the most potent toxins known. Their cleavage of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins in neurons prevents the release of neurotransmitters, thus resulting in the muscle paralysis that is characteristic of botulism. This mechanism of action has been exploited for a variety of therapeutic and cosmetic applications of BoNTs. This chapter provides an overview of the native BoNTs, including the classical serotypes and their clinical use, mosaic BoNTs, and novel BoNTs that have been recently identified in clostridial and non-clostridial strains. In addition, the modular structure of native BoNTs, which are composed of a light chain and a heavy chain, is amenable to a multitude of novel fusions and mutations using molecular biology techniques. These novel recombinant BoNTs have been used or are being developed to further characterize the biology of toxins, to assist in vaccine production, to serve as delivery vehicles to neurons, and to be utilized as novel therapeutics for both neuronal and non-neuronal cells.

Indexed as

Botulinum ToxinsBotulismHumansNeuronsProtein EngineeringBotulinum ToxinsAbobotulinumtoxinABotulinum toxinIncobotulinumtoxinANeurotoxinOnabotulinumtoxinAPrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfsRecombinantRimabotulinumtoxinB

Identifiers

PMID32274579
OpenAlexW3015209591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.