ArticleDysphagia2021
Gastrostomy in Patients with Previous Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study Between the Laparoscopy-Assisted Introducer Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Open Gastrostomy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Dysphagia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on the spectrum of complications in robotic surgery for obese urologic patients: a 6-year retrospective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
- Comparison of enteral nutrition methods with weight improvement in patients with T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Anthropometric parameters as a predictor for abdominal wall thickness in a patient with gastrostomy.PloS one · 2024Article
- Gastrostomies: experience and complications with three modalities in a tertiary centre over a 26-year period.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Straightened nutritional status plays a vital role in the treatment outcome of advanced esophageal cancer. Both introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and open gastrostomy are safe options with avoidance risk of cancer cell seeding. The introducer PEG is an effective minimally invasive procedure with few complications, but the procedural method faces limitations for patients with a history of previous abdominal surgery. This study set out to compare the results of laparoscopy-assisted introducer PEG (LAIPEG) with open gastrostomy in advanced esophageal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery. The advanced esophageal cancer patients who had previous abdominal surgery and indicated an enteral feeding tube between January 2014 and September 2019, were respectively analyzed. The open gastrostomy group was 35 patients, and the LAIPEG group was 18 patients. Operative duration, blood loss, postoperative pain score, and hospitalization time were significantly less in the LAIPEG group. Related procedural complications occurred only in the open gastrostomy group. Both groups are discharged from the hospital without readmission or 30-day mortality. Both procedures are safe options for advanced esophageal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery for enteral feeding nutrition while minimizing the risk of cancer seeding. The LAIPEG demonstrated an effective minimally invasive procedure, which is safe with fewer complications. Previous surgery of the left supramesocolic area may be legitimate concerns before choosing introducer PEG for esophageal cancer with a history of prior surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.