Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32274501›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2020

Exploring Clinically Meaningful Changes for the Frailty Index in a Longitudinal Cohort of Hospitalized Older Patients.

Olga Theou, Alexandra M van der Valk, Judith Godin, Melissa K Andrew, Janet E McElhaney, Shelly A McNeil, Kenneth Rockwood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Monocytes are biological sensors of aging and frailty in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and validation of a long-term survival prediction model for older adults with asthma.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga TheouPhysiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alexandra M van der ValkGeriatric Medicine Research, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Judith GodinGeriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Melissa K AndrewGeriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Janet E McElhaneyHealth Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Shelly A McNeilInfectious Diseases, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodGeriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAHealth Sciences North · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically meaningful change (CMC) for frailty index (FI) scores is little studied. We estimated the CMC by associating changes in FI scores with changes in the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in hospitalized patients.

methodsThe Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network of the Canadian Immunization Research Network enrolled older adults (65+ years) admitted to hospital with acute respiratory illness (mean age = 79.6 ± 8.4 years; 52.7% female). Patients were assigned CFS and 39-item FI scores in-person at admission and via telephone at 1-month postdischarge. Baseline frailty state was assessed at admission using health status 2 weeks before admission. We classified those whose CFS scores remained unchanged (n = 1,534) or increased (n = 4,390) from baseline to hospital admission, and whose CFS scores remained unchanged (n = 1,565) or decreased (n = 2,546) from admission to postdischarge. For each group, the CMC was represented as the FI score change value that best predicted one level CFS change, having the largest Youden J value in comparison to no change.

resultsFrom baseline to admission, 74.1% increased CFS by ≥1 level. From admission to postdischarge, 61.9% decreased CFS by ≥1 levels. A change in FI score of 0.03 best predicted both one-level CFS increase (sensitivity = 70%; specificity = 69%) and decrease (sensitivity = 66%; specificity = 61%) in comparison to no change. Of those who changed CFS by ≥1 levels, 70.9% (baseline to admission) and 72.4% (admission to postdischarge) changed their FI score by at least 0.03.

conclusionsA clinically meaningful change of 0.03 in the frailty index score holds promise as a benchmark for assessing the meaningfulness of frailty interventions.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsAgingClinical frailty scaleClinically meaningful changeFrailty index

Identifiers

PMID32274501
PMCPMC7518565
OpenAlexW3015323006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.