Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32274446›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2020

Prompt vitrectomy for management of endophthalmitis in setting of unexposed glaucoma drainage implant.

Tyler L Junttila, Gareth Mc Lema, Sandra Fernando Sieminski

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler L JunttilaRoss Eye Institute, University at Buffalo, 1176 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Gareth Mc LemaNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, 310 E. 14th Street, New York, NY, USA.
Sandra Fernando SieminskiRoss Eye Institute, University at Buffalo, 1176 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jacobs Institute · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo highlight a rare case of fulminant endophthalmitis in the late post-operative stage after glaucoma drainage device implantation without evidence of device exposure, and to share the unique management that resulted in successful restoration of vision and intraocular pressure control. OBSERVATIONS: Endophthalmitis after glaucoma drainage implantation (GDI) is a rare complication most often associated with exposure of the device. Management options are limited, but removal of GDI is a common approach in the setting of an exposed implant. Visual acuity outcomes are often significantly reduced despite adequate treatment. There is little in the existing literature about management of late-onset endophthalmitis in the setting of a GDI without implant exposure. Here we present such a case that was successfully managed by prompt pars plana vitrectomy and removal of tube from the anterior chamber with subsequent re-insertion and patch graft. Our case results in a restoration of baseline visual acuity and IOP control at 7 months follow up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Endophthalmitis occurring after GDI implantation is a challenging complication to manage. Many physicians resort to removal of device for treatment, and a majority would treat initially with intravitreal antibiotic injection of antibiotics rather than prompt pars plana vitrectomy. This article provides a different approach that avoids removal of the device.

Indexed as

BaerveldtEndophthalimitsGlaucomaGlaucoma drainage device

Identifiers

PMID32274446
PMCPMC7132143
OpenAlexW3011923063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.