ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2020
Prompt vitrectomy for management of endophthalmitis in setting of unexposed glaucoma drainage implant.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A glaucoma drainage implant functioning as a sanctuary site for vitreoretinal lymphoma.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo highlight a rare case of fulminant endophthalmitis in the late post-operative stage after glaucoma drainage device implantation without evidence of device exposure, and to share the unique management that resulted in successful restoration of vision and intraocular pressure control. OBSERVATIONS: Endophthalmitis after glaucoma drainage implantation (GDI) is a rare complication most often associated with exposure of the device. Management options are limited, but removal of GDI is a common approach in the setting of an exposed implant. Visual acuity outcomes are often significantly reduced despite adequate treatment. There is little in the existing literature about management of late-onset endophthalmitis in the setting of a GDI without implant exposure. Here we present such a case that was successfully managed by prompt pars plana vitrectomy and removal of tube from the anterior chamber with subsequent re-insertion and patch graft. Our case results in a restoration of baseline visual acuity and IOP control at 7 months follow up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Endophthalmitis occurring after GDI implantation is a challenging complication to manage. Many physicians resort to removal of device for treatment, and a majority would treat initially with intravitreal antibiotic injection of antibiotics rather than prompt pars plana vitrectomy. This article provides a different approach that avoids removal of the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.