Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32274425›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2020

COVID-19: Global radiation oncology's targeted response for pandemic preparedness.

Richard Simcock, Toms Vengaloor Thomas, Christopher Estes, Andrea R Filippi, Matthew A Katz, Ian J Pereira, Hina Saeed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Richard SimcockBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Toms Vengaloor ThomasUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.
Christopher EstesMercy Hospital, Springfield, MO, USA.
Andrea R FilippiRadiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Matthew A KatzLowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA, USA.
Ian J PereiraQueen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Hina SaeedMedical College of Wisconsin, USA.
Lowell General Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USMercy Hospital Springfield · USPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITQueen's University · CAUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Department of Health 14/49/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global COVID-19 pandemic escalates there is a need within radiation oncology to work to support our patients in the best way possible. Measures are required to reduce infection spread between patients and within the workforce. Departments need contingency planning to create capacity and continue essential treatments despite a reduced workforce. The #radonc community held an urgent online journal club on Twitter in March 2020 to discuss these issues and create some consensus on crucial next steps. There were 121 global contributors. This document summarises these discussions around themes of infection prevention, rationalisation of workload and working practice in the presence of infection.

Indexed as

CancerCOVID-19HypofractionationPandemicRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32274425
PMCPMC7102593
OpenAlexW3013700205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.