ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020
Determination of optimal implantation site in central venous system for wireless hemodynamic monitoring.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Era of Digital Healthcare-A Comprehensive Review of Sensor Technologies and Telehealth Advancements in Chronic Heart Failure Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Design and Haemodynamic Analysis of a Novel Anchoring System for Central Venous Pressure Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeIn recent years, treatment of heart failure patients has proved to benefit from implantation of pressure sensors in the pulmonary artery. Despite this, pulmonary artery pressure is related to the left ventricle, and cannot provide information on the right side of the heart. By contrast, pressure in the central venous system is directly connected to the right atrium and could potentially predict a wider range of heart failure conditions. The purpose of this work is to find an optimal site for implantation in the central venous system of a hemodynamic wireless sensor for heart failure monitoring. Since all previous hemodynamic sensors were located in the pulmonary artery, there is no existing information about an optimal site in the central venous system.
methodsThis study analysed data obtained from CT scans of most relevant anatomical features in the inferior vena cava. The most important parameters of the sites of interest were extracted, analysed statistically and compared, with the purpose to select an optimal site of implantation.
resultsThe results obtained show that the area comprised between the iliac bifurcation and the lower renal vein (and between the second and third lumbar veins) is the most suitable site of implantation for a hemodynamic sensor. Parameters such as its straight anatomy, diameter (21 mm) and link distance (106 mm) present it as a convenient location for implantation. Its procedure appears relatively easy, as access from the femoral vein is close to the site of interest. In addition, there are not major delicate structure in its surroundings that may pose a risk to the patient.
conclusionThis study concludes that the area between the iliac join and the lower renal vein (and the 2nd and 3rd lumbar veins) is an optimal site for the accommodation of a hemodynamic sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.