ArticleConservation physiology2020
Striving for population-level conservation: integrating physiology across the biological hierarchy.
Article in Conservation physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmentally induced stress affects fitness of bold and shy alike: A long-term study of personality and feather corticosterone in Arctic-breeding kittiwakes.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Gene-to-Population Level Responses to Multiple Stressors on the Rocky Shore.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Challenging 10 misconceptions in conservation physiology.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- The lab-field continuum in conservation physiology research: leveraging multiple approaches to inform policy and practice.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- Co-production and conservation physiology: outcomes, challenges and opportunities arising from reflections on diverse co-produced projects.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- A predictive timeline of wildlife population collapse.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Review
- Distribution and morphological variation of tree ferns (Cyatheaceae) along an elevation gradient.PloS one · 2023Article
- The cost of sympatry: spatio-temporal patterns in leopard dietary and physiological responses to tiger competition gradient in Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India.Conservation physiology · 2023Article
- A sampling, exposure and receptor framework for identifying factors that modulate behavioural responses to disturbance in cetaceans.The Journal of animal ecology · 2022Article
- Complex tourism and season interactions contribute to disparate physiologies in an endangered rock iguana.Conservation physiology · 2022Article
- Physiological basis of interactive responses to temperature and salinity in coastal marine invertebrate: Implications for responses to warming.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Context-dependent variability in the predicted daily energetic costs of disturbance for blue whales.Conservation physiology · 2021Article
- Ontogeny of osmoregulation of the Asian shore crabConservation physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of conservation physiology strives to achieve conservation goals by revealing physiological mechanisms that drive population declines in the face of human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC) and has informed many successful conservation actions. However, many studies still struggle to explicitly link individual physiological measures to impacts across the biological hierarchy (to population and ecosystem levels) and instead rely on a 'black box' of assumptions to scale up results for conservation implications. Here, we highlight some examples of studies that were successful in scaling beyond the individual level, including two case studies of well-researched species, and using other studies we highlight challenges and future opportunities to increase the impact of research by scaling up the biological hierarchy. We first examine studies that use individual physiological measures to scale up to population-level impacts and discuss several emerging fields that have made significant steps toward addressing the gap between individual-based and demographic studies, such as macrophysiology and landscape physiology. Next, we examine how future studies can scale from population or species-level to community- and ecosystem-level impacts and discuss avenues of research that can lead to conservation implications at the ecosystem level, such as abiotic gradients and interspecific interactions. In the process, we review methods that researchers can use to make links across the biological hierarchy, including crossing disciplinary boundaries, collaboration and data sharing, spatial modelling and incorporating multiple markers (e.g. physiological, behavioural or demographic) into their research. We recommend future studies incorporating tools that consider the diversity of 'landscapes' experienced by animals at higher levels of the biological hierarchy, will make more effective contributions to conservation and management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.