Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273992›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Metapopulation dynamics and foraging plasticity in a highly vagile seabird, the southern rockhopper penguin.

Nicolás A Lois, Leonardo Campagna, Ulises Balza, Michael J Polito, Klemens Pütz, Juliana A Vianna, Annick Morgenthaler, Esteban Frere, Ricardo Sáenz-Samaniego, Andrea Raya Rey and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolás A LoisInstituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IEGEBA-CONICET) Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-0486
Leonardo CampagnaFuller Evolutionary Biology Program Cornell Lab of Ornithology Cornell University Ithaca NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-8553
Ulises BalzaDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Universidad de Buenos Aires (DEGE-FCEyN-UBA) Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1538-2438
Michael J PolitoDepartment of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA USA.
Klemens PützAntarctic Research Trust Bremervörde Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1375-2669
Juliana A ViannaDepartamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-7825
Annick MorgenthalerCentro de Investigaciones Puerto Deseado UACO Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral Puerto Deseado, Santa Cruz Argentina.
Esteban FrereCentro de Investigaciones Puerto Deseado UACO Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral Puerto Deseado, Santa Cruz Argentina.
Ricardo Sáenz-SamaniegoCentro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CADIC-CONICET) Ushuaia Argentina.
Andrea Raya ReyCentro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CADIC-CONICET) Ushuaia Argentina.
Bettina MahlerInstituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IEGEBA-CONICET) Buenos Aires Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Austral Patagonia · ARCornell University · USLouisiana State University · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population connectivity is driven by individual dispersal potential and modulated by natal philopatry. In seabirds, high vagility facilitates dispersal yet philopatry is also common, with foraging area overlap often correlated with population connectivity. We assess the interplay between these processes by studying past and current connectivity and foraging niche overlap among southern rockhopper penguin colonies of the coast of southern South America using genomic and stable isotope analyses. We found two distinct genetic clusters and detected low admixture between northern and southern colonies. Stable isotope analysis indicated niche variability between colonies, with Malvinas/Falklands colonies encompassing the species entire isotopic foraging niche, while the remaining colonies had smaller, nonoverlapping niches. A recently founded colony in continental Patagonia differed in isotopic niche width and position with Malvinas/Falklands colonies, its genetically identified founder population, suggesting the exploitation of novel foraging areas and/or prey items. Additionally, dispersing individuals found dead across the Patagonian shore in an unusual mortality event were also assigned to the northern cluster, suggesting northern individuals reach southern localities, but do not breed in these colonies. Facilitated by variability in foraging strategies, and especially during unfavorable conditions, the number of dispersing individuals may increase and enhance the probability of founding new colonies. Metapopulation demographic dynamics in seabirds should account for interannual variability in dispersal behavior and pay special attention to extreme climatic events, classically related to negative effects on population trends.

Indexed as

ddRADEudyptes chrysocomepopulation dynamicsSIBERtrophic niche

Identifiers

PMID32273992
PMCPMC7141044
OpenAlexW3009167066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.