Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old.

Sara Alves, Laetitia Teixeira, Oscar Ribeiro, Constança Paúl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trends in Frailty Between 1990 and 2020 in Sweden Among 75-, 85-, and 95-Year-Old Women and Men: A Nationwide Study from Sweden.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Machine Learning Approaches for the Frailty Screening: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara AlvesAbel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences-University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Porto, Portugal.
Laetitia TeixeiraAbel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences-University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Porto, Portugal.
Oscar RibeiroCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS.UA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Constança PaúlAbel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences-University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Porto, Portugal.
Centre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrailty has been studied among the old population due to its association with negative outcomes. Presently there is no gold standard for measuring frailty, but several studies have used the frailty phenotype of Fried consisting of five components (weakness, slowness, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity) that classify individuals as robust, pre-frail, or frail, depending on the number of components affected, respectively, zero, one or two, and three or more. This study aims to explore the specific contribution of each of these components to the frailty phenotype in a sample of oldest old community-dwelling individuals. MATERIALS AND

methodsIndividuals aged 80+ years old living in the community (

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 88.07 years ( DISCUSSION: Results revealed a high number of pre-frail and frail participants. MCA proved to add an important understanding in examining the frailty phenotype; it revealed weakness as the most discriminant component for dimension 1, suggesting a high association with the frailty phenotype. MCA also identified two main features of frailty: one related with physical features (motor behavioral and grip strength) including weakness, low physical activity, and slowness; and the second related with intrinsic conditions (unintentional weight loss and exhaustion).

conclusionThis study corroborates the need of a differentiated approach to the frailty phenotype among very old individuals, bringing for consideration the specific influence of its components.

Indexed as

frailty dimensionsFried phenotype of frailtyoldest oldphenotype componentsphysical frailty

Identifiers

PMID32273861
PMCPMC7113383
OpenAlexW3013909513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.