Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273827›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2020

Evaluation of the effect of piezo-intracytoplasmic sperm injection on the laboratory, clinical, and neonatal outcomes.

Yoshitaka Fujii, Yuji Endo, Shingo Mitsuhata, Momoko Hayashi, Hiroaki Motoyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Imaging the subcellular viscoelastic properties of mouse oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoshitaka FujiiIVF Center Kurashiki Medical Clinic Kurashiki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2207-4230
Yuji EndoIVF Center Kurashiki Medical Clinic Kurashiki Japan.
Shingo MitsuhataIVF Center Kurashiki Medical Clinic Kurashiki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-0158
Momoko HayashiIVF Center Kurashiki Medical Clinic Kurashiki Japan.
Hiroaki MotoyamaIVF Center Kurashiki Medical Clinic Kurashiki Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited research has been published on the effect of piezo-assisted intracytoplasmic sperm injection (P-ICSI). We evaluated the effect of P-ICSI on the laboratory, clinical, and neonatal outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective study was based on the data collected between April 2011 and October 2016. Total 1348 mature oocytes from 145 patients were analyzed. Laboratory, clinical, and neonatal outcomes of those given conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (C-ICSI) and those administered P-ICSI were examined.

resultsP-ICSI showed significantly more favorable results, with a survival rate of 97.0% (C-ICSI: 94.1%,

conclusionsOur comparison of P-ICSI with C-ICSI showed that P-ICSI significantly improved the survival and fertilization.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologyfertilizationICSIneonatal outcomespiezo

Identifiers

PMID32273827
PMCPMC7138935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.