ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2020
Time-lapse monitoring of mouse embryos produced by injecting sonicated, frozen-thawed sperm heads with high or low chromosomal integrity.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low levels of mouse sperm chromatin fragmentation delay embryo development.Biology of reproduction · 2023Article
- Improved developmental potential of mouse vitrified-warmed oocytes achieved by culturing in recovery medium with glutathione ethyl ester (GSH-OEt).Reproductive medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Time-lapse monitoring of mouse embryos produced by injecting sonicated, frozen-thawed sperm heads with high or low chromosomal integrity.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the first-division kinetics and in vitro development of embryos produced by injecting sonicated sperm heads with high or low chromosomal integrity into oocytes.
methodsMouse spermatozoa were frozen after separating the sperm heads from the tails by sonication in an EGTA solution (EGTA group) or M2 medium (M2 group). The chromosomal integrity of sonicated mouse spermatozoa was analyzed by injecting the sperm heads into fresh mouse oocytes. The developmental potential of spermatozoa was examined by injecting the sperm heads into vitrified-warming mouse oocytes. We used a time-lapse monitoring system to compare the first-division kinetics.
resultsChromosomal integrity was preserved significantly more frequently in the EGTA group (90.6%) than in the M2 group (32.7%). Blastocysts developed significantly more often in the EGTA group (80.8%) than in the M2 group (39.6%). In the M2 group, with frequent chromosome aberrations, the time between the sperm injection and first cleavage was delayed (18.4 hours), compared to the EGTA group (16.5 hours). All results of the EGTA group were similar to that of fresh epididymal spermatozoa.
conclusionThe EGTA solution for sonication maintained the integrity of sperm chromosomes. Our results revealed a relationship between sperm chromosome integrity and first-division kinetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.