Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273704›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Simultaneous Real-Time Detection of Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A and -A2 Using a Graphene Oxide-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor.

Shi-Yuan Fan, Nan-Fu Chiu, Chie-Pein Chen, Chia-Chen Chang, Chen-Yu Chen

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Immunoassay-Amplified Responses Using a Functionalized MoSInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Exploring Graphene and MoSFrontiers in chemistry · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shi-Yuan FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-984X
Nan-Fu ChiuInstitute of Electro-Optical Science and Technology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-5483
Chie-Pein ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Chen ChangDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Chen-Yu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-8391
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWNational Taiwan Normal University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and -A2 (PAPP-A and -A2) are principally expressed in placental trophoblasts and play a critical role in the regulation of fetal and placental growth. PAPP-A2 shares 45% amino acid similarity with PAPP-A. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of real-time detection of PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 using a novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor based on graphene oxide (GO). Methods: Traditional SPR and GO-based SPR chips were fabricated to measure PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 concentrations. We compared SPR response curves of PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 between traditional SPR and GO-SPR biosensors. We also performed interference tests and specificity analyses among PAPP-A, PAPP-A2, and mixed interference proteins. Results: The time to detect PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 was about 150 seconds with both traditional SPR and GO-SPR biosensors. Approximately double SPR angle shifts were noted with the GO-SPR biosensor compared to the traditional SPR biosensor at a PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 concentration of 5 μg/mL. The limit of detection of the GO-SPR biosensor was as low as 0.5 ng/mL for both PAPP-A and PAPP-A2. Interference testing revealed that almost all of the protein bonded on the GO-SPR biosensor with anti-PAPP-A from the mixture of proteins was PAPP-A, and that almost no other proteins were captured except for PAPP-A2. However, the SPR signal of PAPP-A2 (5.75 mdeg) was much smaller than that of PAPP-A (13.76 mdeg). Similar results were noted with anti-PAPP-A2, where almost all of the protein bonded on the GO-SPR biosensor was PAPP-A2. The SPR signal of PAPP-A (5.17 mdeg) was much smaller than that of PAPP-A2 (13.94 mdeg). Conclusion: The GO-SPR biosensor could distinguish PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 from various mixed interference proteins with high sensitivity and specificity. It could potentially be used to measure PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 in clinical blood samples during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCross ReactionsEquipment DesignFemaleGraphiteHumansImmunoassayPregnancyPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-ASurface Plasmon Resonancegraphene oxideGraphitePAPPA2 protein, humanPAPPA protein, humanPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-Abiosensorgraphene oxidepregnancy-associated plasma protein-Apregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2surface plasmon resonance

Identifiers

PMID32273704
PMCPMC7105368
OpenAlexW3012997273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.