Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

O/W Nanoemulsion as an Adjuvant for an Inactivated H3N2 Influenza Vaccine: Based on Particle Properties and Mode of Carrying.

Lanhua Zhao, Zhe Zhu, Lei Ma, Yingbo Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Nanotechnology-driven nanoemulsion gel for enhanced transdermal delivery ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lanhua ZhaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Kunming 650118, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-7353
Zhe ZhuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Kunming 650118, People's Republic of China.
Lei MaInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Kunming 650118, People's Republic of China.
Yingbo LiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Kunming 650118, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAdjuvant can reduce vaccine dosage and acquire better immune protection to the body, which helps to deal with the frequent outbreaks of influenza. Nanoemulsion adjuvants have been proved efficient, but the relationship between their key properties and the controlled release which greatly affects immune response is still unclear. The present work explores the role of factors such as particle size, the polydispersity index (PDI), stability and the safety of nanoemulsions by optimizing the water concentration, oil phase and modes of carrying, to explain the impact of those key factors above on adjuvant effect.

methodsIsopropyl myristate (IPM), white oil, soybean oil, and grape-kernel oil were chosen as the oil phase to explore their roles in emulsion characteristics and the adjuvant effect. ICR mice were immunized with an emulsion-inactivated H3N2 split influenza vaccine mixture, to compare the nanoemulsion's adjuvant with traditional aluminium hydroxide or complete Freund's adjuvant.

resultsParticle size of all the nanoemulsion formed in our experiment ranged from 20 nm to 200 nm and did not change much when diluted with water, while the PDI decreased obviously, indicating that the particles tended to become more dispersive. Formulas with 80% or 85.6% water concentration showed significant higher HAI titer than aluminium hydroxide or complete Freund's adjuvant, and adsorption rather than capsule mode showed higher antigen delivery efficiency. As mentioned about oil phase, G (IPM), F (white oil), H (soybean oil), and I (grape-kernel oil) showed a decreasing trend in their adjuvant efficiency, and nanoemulsion G was the best adjuvant with smaller and uniform particle size.

conclusionEmulsions with a smaller, uniform particle size had a better adjuvant effect, and the adsorption mode was generally more efficient than the capsule mode. The potential adjuvant order of the different oils was as follows: IPM > white oil > soybean oil > grape-kernel oil.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsEmulsionsFemaleInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMice, Inbred ICRNanostructuresOilsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsParticle SizeSoybean OilVaccines, InactivatedWaterAdjuvants, ImmunologicEmulsionsInfluenza VaccinesOilsSoybean OilVaccines, InactivatedWaterinfluenza vaccinemode of carryingnanoemulsionoil phaseparticle properties

Identifiers

PMID32273703
PMCPMC7104212
OpenAlexW3013884708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.