Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32273690›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2020

Pharmacological Therapy of Osteoporosis: What's New?

Giovanni Iolascon, Antimo Moretti, Giuseppe Toro, Francesca Gimigliano, Sara Liguori, Marco Paoletta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effect of Eight-Month Exercise Intervention on Bone Outcomes of Young Opioid-Dependent Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Inflammaging-Driven Osteoporosis: Is a Galectin-Targeted Approach Needed?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PeerJ · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni IolasconDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-925X
Antimo MorettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4598-2891
Giuseppe ToroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-721X
Francesca GimiglianoDepartment of Physical and Mental Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-6405
Sara LiguoriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marco PaolettaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-9738
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are relevant health issues because of their impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Despite this alarming scenario, both underdiagnosis and undertreatment are common features of osteoporotic patients, particularly those who have already sustained a fragility fracture. Pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis is the main treatment option for these patients because of strong evidence about the efficacy of available drugs targeting bone metabolism. However, several issues can interfere with the effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice, such as lack of awareness of both healthcare providers and patients, poor adherence to therapy, and safety in long-term treatment. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies have been proposed to overcome these problems, such as sequential therapy or emerging molecules mainly targeting the stimulation of bone formation. In particular, abaloparatide has been demonstrated to reduce major nonvertebral fracture risk compared with both placebo and teriparatide, although the European Medicines Agency (EMA) refused the marketing authorization because the benefits of this drug did not outweigh its risks. On the other side, EMA has recently approved romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against sclerostin and the only available therapeutic option targeting Wnt signaling, as both bone-forming and antiresorptive intervention to treat osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesParathyroid Hormone-Related ProteinTeriparatideabaloparatideAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsParathyroid Hormone-Related ProteinromosozumabTeriparatideabaloparatideantiresorptive drugsbone anabolic drugsosteoporosisromosozumabsequential therapy

Identifiers

PMID32273690
PMCPMC7105363
OpenAlexW3013826198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.