ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019
Diagnostic Performance of Receptor-Specific Surgical Specimen Staining Correlate with Receptor Expression Level.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of tumor margins in the operating room in real time is a critical challenge for surgical procedures that serve as cancer cure. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is particularly affected by this problem, with current re-excision rates above 25%. Due to a lack of clinically available methodologies for detection of involved or close tumor margins, much effort is focused on developing intraoperative margin assessment modalities that can aid in addressing this unmet clinical need. BCS provides a unique opportunity to design contrast-based technologies that are able to assess tumor margins independent from the patient, providing a rapid pathway from bench to bedside at a much lower cost. Since resected tissue is removed from the patient's blood supply, non-specific contrast agent uptake becomes a challenge due to the lack of clearance. Therefore, a dual probe, ratiometric fluorescence imaging approach was taken in an effort to reduce non-specific signal, and provide a modality that could demonstrate rapid, robust margin assessment on resected patient samples. Termed, dual-stain difference specimen imaging (DDSI), DDSI includes the use of spectrally unique, and fluorescently labeled target-specific, as well as non-specific biomarkers. In the present study, we have applied epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted DDSI to tumor xenografts with variable EGFR expression levels using a previously optimized staining protocol, allowing for a quantitative assessment of the predictive power of the technique under biologically relevant conditions. Due to the presence of necrosis in the model tumors, ring analysis was employed to characterize diagnostic accuracy as measured by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Our findings demonstrate the robust nature of the DDSI technique even in the presence of variable biomarker expression and spatial patterns. These results support the continued development of this technology as a robust diagnostic tool for tumor margin assessment in resected specimens during BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.