ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2020
The new bioabsorbable sheet for the sling method in immediate breast reconstruction with expander-implant: a study protocol for interventional prospective study.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The popularity of a sling method using biomaterial sheets for immediate breast reconstruction based on prosthesis has been increasing in western countries. However, acellular dermal matrix, which is representative of the biomaterial sheet, is not available and the sling method also has not been accepted in Japan. We focused on a new bioabsorbable sheet (NEOVEIL sheet) as a substitute for the sling method and report a prospective study protocol to assess the safety and effectiveness of this material. This was an ongoing, single center, open-label, single-arm study. Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria are defined restrictively. If the surgeon determined that the perfusion of skin envelope after mastectomy is poor, the surgical procedure can be modified and that patient was excluded from the study. The primary outcome was the incidence of tissue expansion or implant explantation occurring within 1 month after surgery. The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) aesthetic outcome using a rating scale; (2) symmetry of the nipple areolar complex position; (3) patient reported outcomes using BREAST-Q; (4) pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale; (5) histology of the capsule around the tissue expander; (6) inflation volume at the first stage and overall inflation time of expansion; and (7) other adverse events regarding the surgery. This study will determine the safety and effectiveness of the sling method using a NEOVEIL sheet in Japanese women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.