ArticleSpinal cord2020
Return to work after spinal cord injury: a Singaporean pilot community-based rehabilitation program.
Article in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Project FORWARD: Where Vocational Rehabilitation Can Make a Difference through Community-Based Participatory Research.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Vocational Rehabilitation Programs for People with Acquired Physical Disabilities.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Community integration after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Predictors and causal mediators.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Recruitment Challenges in Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial for Motor Recovery in Patients with Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Describing community-based rehabilitation services in Indonesia by using The International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation 2.0.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.Advances in rehabilitation science and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective analysis of data collected as part of a pilot program.
objectivesThe primary objective of our study was to document the return-to-work rate of individuals with SCI who participated in a community-based interdisciplinary vocational rehabilitation program. The secondary objectives were to assess changes in their levels of community integration and functional independence.
settingA community-based rehabilitation center in Singapore.
methodsParticipants were individuals with SCI between 21 and 55 years. They identified return to work as a rehabilitation goal, and were certified fit to undergo rehabilitation by their physicians. Primary outcome was the return-to-work rate at discharge from the program. Secondary outcomes were community integration and functional independence, measured by the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III), respectively. We summarized participants' clinical and socio-demographic characteristics descriptively, and used inferential statistics to compare pre- and postprogram scores for secondary outcome measures.
resultsThirty-nine participants were included for this study. Thirty-two completed the program, of which 84% (n = 27) reported returning to work. Participants who completed the program had mean change in total CIQ and SCIM-III scores of 7 (95% CI, 5-8) and 11 (95% CI, 7-15), respectively. There were differences (p < 0.05) between pre- and postprogram scores for both secondary outcome measures.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that our vocational rehabilitation program facilitated participants with SCI in Singapore to return to work and was beneficial to enhance their levels of community integration and functional independence. Future interventional studies are recommended to estimate the efficacy of such programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32273565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.