Increased pollen source area does not always enhance the risk of pollen dispersal and gene flow in Oryza sativa L.

Ning Hu, Xiaodong Jiang, Qianhua Yuan, Wuge Liu, Kemin Yao, Yan Long, Xinwu Pei

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ning HuYale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.

Xiaodong JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Agriculture Meteorology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.

Qianhua YuanCollege of Tropical Agriculture, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.

Wuge LiuRice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

Kemin YaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Agriculture Meteorology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.

Yan LongBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.

Xinwu PeiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China. peixinwu@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollen dispersal is one of the main ways of gene flow. In the past years, rice pollen dispersal and gene flow have been well studies. However, there is much dispute whether the risk of pollen dispersal and gene flow continuously increases with the source area. A Lagrangian stochastic model was used to simulate the pollen depositions at different distances from different pollen source areas. The field experiments showed a good fit in the pollen depositions. The larger the source area, the more the pollen grains were deposited at each distance, with the pollen dispersal distance increasing accordingly. However, this effect gradually leveled off as the source area increased. In the large-area of pollen source, we found a significantly higher saturation point for the amount of pollen deposition. Once the source area exceeded 1000 × 1000 m

Indexed as

Gene FlowPollinationModels, StatisticalOryzaPollen

Identifiers

PMID32273546

DOI10.1038/s41598-020-63119-z

PMCPMC7145849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.