Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32272876›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting wolfberry genotypes during fruit development and ripening and characterization of the LrMYB1 transcription factor that regulates flavonoid biosynthesis.

Cuiping Wang, Yan Dong, Lizhen Zhu, Libin Wang, Li Yan, Mengze Wang, Qiang Zhu, Xiongxiong Nan, Yonghua Li, Jian Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-Wide Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cuiping WangState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China. wangcuipingcas@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-5532
Yan DongNational Wheat Improvement Center, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Lizhen ZhuState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Libin WangBiochip Research Center, the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Li YanState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Mengze WangState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Qiang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Xiongxiong NanState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Yonghua LiState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Jian LiState Key Laboratory of Seedling Bioengineering, Ningxia Forestry Institute, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNingxia Medical University · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFD1000607the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province of China No. NZ17229Young Scientists Fund 31701878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLycium barbarum and L. ruthenicum have been used as traditional medicinal plants in China and other Asian counties for centuries. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying fruit development and ripening, as well as the associated production of medicinal and nutritional components, have been little explored in these two species.

resultsA competitive transcriptome analysis was performed to identify the regulators and pathways involved in the fruit ripening of red wolfberry (L. barbarum) and black wolfberry (L. ruthenicum) using an Illumina sequencing platform. In total, 155,606 genes and 194,385 genes were detected in red wolfberry (RF) and black wolfberry (BF), respectively. Of them, 20,335, 24,469, and 21,056 genes were differentially expressed at three different developmental stages in BF and RF. Functional categorization of the differentially expressed genes revealed that phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, anthocyanin biosynthesis, and sugar metabolism were the most differentially regulated processes during fruit development and ripening in the RF and BF. Furthermore, we also identified 38 MYB transcription factor-encoding genes that were differentially expressed during black wolfberry fruit development. Overexpression of LrMYB1 resulted in the activation of structural genes for flavonoid biosynthesis and led to an increase in flavonoid content, suggesting that the candidate genes identified in this RNA-seq analysis are credible and might offer important utility.

conclusionThis study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanism of Lycium fruit development and ripening and will be of value to novel gene discovery and functional genomic studies.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingFlavonoidsFruitGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLyciumPlant ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNATranscription FactorsFlavonoidsPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAnthocyanin synthesisIllumina sequencingL. ruthenicumLycium barbarumMYB transcription factorSugar metabolism

Identifiers

PMID32272876
PMCPMC7147035
OpenAlexW3015686491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.