Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Taliana BezerraDepartment of Food Engineering, Technology Centre, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-4024
Mario EstévezAnimal Production and Food Science Department, IPROCAR Research Institute, Avda Ciencias s/n, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-2789
José Thalles LacerdaDepartment of Biophysics Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Tres de Maio, 2 andar, São Paulo 100, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-7197
Meriellen DiasDempster MS Lab-Chemical Engineering, Department of Polytechnic, School of University of Saõ Paulo, Saõ Paulo Rua do Lago 250, Bloco B 3, Saõ Paulo 05508-080, Brazil.
Maria JulianoDepartment of Biophysics Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Tres de Maio, 2 andar, São Paulo 100, Brazil.
Maria Anita MendesDempster MS Lab-Chemical Engineering, Department of Polytechnic, School of University of Saõ Paulo, Saõ Paulo Rua do Lago 250, Bloco B 3, Saõ Paulo 05508-080, Brazil.
Marcelo MorganoInstitute of Food Technology (ITAL), Brasil Ave 2880, P.O. Box 139, Campinas 13070-178, Brazil.
Maria Teresa PachecoInstitute of Food Technology (ITAL), Brasil Ave 2880, P.O. Box 139, Campinas 13070-178, Brazil.
Marta MadrugaDepartment of Food Engineering, Technology Centre, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-3178
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidad de Extremadura · ES
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The production of bioactive peptides from organic by-waste materials is in line with current trends devoted to guaranteeing environmental protection and a circular economy. The objectives of this study were i) to optimize the conditions for obtaining bioactive hydrolysates from chicken combs and wattles using Alcalase, ii) to identify the resulting peptides using LC-ESI-MS
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Chicken Combs and Wattles as Sources of Bioactive Peptides: Optimization of Hydrolysis, Identification by LC-ESI-MS · full record | OpenQuestion