Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32272710›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Addressing Sustainable Social Change for All: Upcycled-Based Social Creative Businesses for the Transformation of Socio-Technical Regimes.

Sara Calvo, Andrés Morales, Pedro Núñez-Cacho Utrilla, José Manuel Guaita Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara CalvoBusiness and Communication Department, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, 26009 La Rioja, Spain.
Andrés MoralesBusiness and Communication Department, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, 26009 La Rioja, Spain.
Pedro Núñez-Cacho UtrillaPolytechnic School of Linares, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3674-7715
José Manuel Guaita MartínezBusiness Deparment, Valencian International University, 46002 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7050-3389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global challenges caused by socio-economic inequalities, climate change and environmental damage caused to ecosystems, require changes in human behavior at all organizational levels, including companies, governments, communities, and individuals. In this context, it is important to analyse how social and creative companies that work in the fashion and industrial design recycling sector can address sustainable social change. In this paper, we propose an analysis in the countries of the global South. To learn how grassroots innovations can contribute to the development of sustainable strategies, we perform the framework of Technical transitions. We analyze the three main areas of activity that constitute an effective niche construction: social networks, expectations and visions, and learning. A qualitative methodology is used, a video case study with six grassroots organizations in South Africa, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Brazil. The results reflect the important role played by these grassroots innovations, contributing to the development of social and creative recycling companies that address socio-economic and environmental problems.

Indexed as

RecyclingSocial ChangeSocioeconomic FactorsBrazilEcosystemHumansIndustryMalaysiaSouth AfricaSri Lankagrassroots organizationsnichessocial and creative enterprisessocio-technical regimesupcyclingvideo research

Identifiers

PMID32272710
PMCPMC7178201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.