Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32272663›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Modeling Adaptation Strategies against Climate Change Impacts in Integrated Rice-Wheat Agricultural Production System of Pakistan.

Muhammad Khalid Anser, Tayyaba Hina, Shahzad Hameed, Muhammad Hamid Nasir, Ishfaq Ahmad, Muhammad Asad Ur Rehman Naseer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices Impact Farmers' Income? Evidence from Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of rice and wheat production efficiency based on data envelopment analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Khalid AnserSchool of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1882-0907
Tayyaba HinaInstitute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Punjab 38040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-5845
Shahzad HameedThe School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-2098
Muhammad Hamid NasirThe School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.
Ishfaq AhmadCentre for Climate Research and Development, COMSATS University, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-7951
Muhammad Asad Ur Rehman NaseerInstitute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Punjab 38040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-9073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous anticipated effects of climate change (CC) on agriculture in the developing and the developed world. Pakistan is among the top ten most prone nations to CC in the world. The objective of this analysis was to quantify the economic impacts of CC on the agricultural production system and to quantify the impacts of suggested adaptation strategies at the farm level. The study was conducted in the Punjab province's rice-wheat cropping system. For this purpose, climate modeling was carried out by using two representative concentration pathways (RCPs), i.e., RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, and five global circulation models (GCMs). The crop modeling was carried out by using the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) and the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) crop simulation models (CSMs), which were tested on the cross-sectional data of 217 farm households collected from the seven strata in the study area. The socio-economic impacts were calculated using the Multidimensional Impact Assessment Tradeoff Analysis Model (TOA-MD). The results revealed that CC's net economic impact using both RCPs and CSMs was negative. In both CSMs, the poverty status was higher in RCP 8.5 than in RCP 4.5. The adaptation package showed positive results in poverty reduction and improvement in the livelihood conditions of the agricultural households. The adoption rate for DSSAT was about 78%, and for APSIM, it was about 68%. The adaptation benefits observed in DSSAT were higher than in APSIM. The results showed that the suggested adaptations could have a significant impact on the resilience of the atmospheric changes. Therefore, without these adaptation measures, i.e., increase in sowing density, improved cultivars, increase in nitrogen use, and fertigation, there would be negative impacts of CC that would capitalize on livelihood and food security in the study area.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeOryzaTriticumAgriculturePakistanadaptation packagesclimate changeimpact assessmentPakistanrice-wheat agricultural system

Identifiers

PMID32272663
PMCPMC7177414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.