ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal cutoff value of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score for diagnosing dry eye disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire in different languages.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Review
- Tear Fluid Biomarkers and Quality of Life in People with Type 2 Diabetes and Dry Eye Disease.Metabolites · 2023Article
- P4 Medicine for Heterogeneity of Dry Eye: A Mobile Health-based Digital Cohort Study.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2023Review
- Reliability and Validity of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Smartphone App AllerSearch for Hay Fever: Prospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score questionnaire.PloS one · 2022Article
- Effect of care intervention based on susceptible pointers of care quality in patients with hepatic cerebropathy.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Thai version of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score questionnaire: preliminary assessment for psychometric properties.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity of eye drop use among symptomatic dry eye individuals in Japan: large-scale crowdsourced research using DryEyeRhythm application.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Observational
- Diagnostic ability of maximum blink interval together with Japanese version of Ocular Surface Disease Index score for dry eye disease.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) between the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) and the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS). A total of 169 participants were enrolled between September 2017 and May 2018. Patients were administered the J-OSDI and DEQS questionnaires at their first (baseline) and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between the J-OSDI total score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) scores were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. At the baseline visit, the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) were significantly correlated (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.