ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Clinical value of multiorgan damage in hypertensive crises: A prospective follow-up study.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrastive Machine Learning to Quantify Hypertensive Multiorgan Damage and Identify New Disease Phenotypes: A Multinational Multimodal Study.Circulation · 2026Article
- Factors Predicting Renal Outcomes in Hypertensive Emergencies With Severe Renal Impairment: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- The potential role of complement alternative pathway activation in hypertensive renal damage.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Article
- Clinical value of multiorgan damage in hypertensive crises: A prospective follow-up study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertensive crises are associated with high rates of target organ complications and poor outcomes. A recent shift from the definition of malignant hypertension to hypertension-multiorgan damage (MOD) contributes to the diagnosis and management of hypertensive crises. Here, we prospectively included 166 adult (≥18 years old) patients with hypertensive crises (blood pressure >180/120 mm Hg). Target organs and causes of hypertension were assessed. Patients who were diagnosed with malignant hypertensive retinopathy, the absence of malignant hypertensive retinopathy but the presence of damage to at least 3 organs, and the absence of both retinopathy and MOD were classified as the malignant hypertension (n = 48), hypertension-MOD (n = 42), and hypertension without MOD (n = 76) groups, respectively. Patients were followed to evaluate renal and cardiovascular prognoses. At baseline, patients with malignant hypertension had worse renal function, higher level of albuminuria, and more severe microvascular damage than those with hypertension-MOD. Both had similar proportions of malignant arteriolar nephrosclerosis (83% vs 64%), left ventricular hypertrophy (90% vs 88%), abnormal repolarization (71% vs 60%), and left ventricular dysfunction (12% vs 21%). At the twenty months of follow-up, both the malignant hypertension and hypertension-MOD groups had similar blood pressure control rates and proteinuria. Both groups had worse renal outcomes than the hypertension without MOD group (P = .002). Patients with hypertension-MOD (HR = 0.67, [95% CI: 0.30-1.46], P = .31) had similar renal event-free survival than patients with MHT after adjustments of age, sex, blood pressure, and proteinuria control. These results suggest that in hypertensive crises, both malignant hypertension and hypertension-MOD have impact on adverse renal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.