Observational studyBlood advances2020
The Connect CLL Registry: final analysis of 1494 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia across 199 US sites.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01081015 (Connect™ CLL), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Connect™ CLL: The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Disease Registry
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lisocabtagene maraleucel in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (TRANSCEND CLL 004): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 study.Lancet (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter retrospective study in Greece.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Favorable outcomes of restrictive treatment indications in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of Brazilian Registry of CLL.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Real-world characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with 2 or more LOTs for CLL/SLL in the United States.Blood neoplasia · 2025Article
- Results from a Real-World Multicenter Analysis of 482 Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib: A Look at Racial Differences.Targeted oncology · 2023Article
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities in CLL/SLL: analysis of SEER data from 2006 to 2019.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Clinical and Cytogenetic Characterization, and Outcome of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in a Single Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.Clinical hematology international · 2023Article
- Ibrutinib Is Associated With Increased Cardiovascular Events and Major Bleeding in Older CLL Patients.JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Article
- A History of Targeted Therapy Development and Progress in Novel-Novel Combinations for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).Cancers · 2023Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Regimen in Indian Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Patients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2023Article
- Real-world Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Ibrutinib or Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia by Risk Status.Advances in therapy · 2022Article
- Distinct Age-Related Clinical Features and Risk Assessment in Chinese With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains unclear. The Connect CLL Registry, a United States-based multicenter prospective observational cohort study, enrolled 1494 patients between 2010 and 2014 from predominantly community-based settings. Patients were grouped by line of therapy (LOT) at enrollment. With a median follow-up of 46.6 months (range, 0-63.0 months), median overall survival (OS) was not reached in LOT1, 63.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.0-63.0 months) in LOT2, and 38.0 months (95% CI, 33.0-47.0 months) in LOT≥3. Bendamustine and rituximab (BR; 33.5%); fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR; 21.4%); and rituximab monotherapy (18.5%) were the most common regimens across LOTs. Median event-free survival (EFS) was similar in patients treated with BR (59.0 months) and FCR (55.0 months) in LOT1; median OS was not reached. In multivariable analysis, BR or FCR vs other treatments in LOT1 was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P < .0001) and OS (0.67; P = .0162). Using the Kaplan-Meier product limit, ibrutinib vs other treatments improved OS in LOT2 (HR, 0.279; P = .009), LOT3 (0.441; P = .011), and LOT≥4 (0.578; P = .043). Prognostic modeling of death at 2 years postenrollment identified 3 risk groups: low (mortality rate, 6.2%), medium (14.5%), and high (27.4%). The most frequent adverse events across LOTs were pneumonia (11.6%) and febrile neutropenia (6.2%). These data suggest that advantages of LOT1 FCR over BR seen in clinical trials may not translate to community practice, whereas receiving novel LOT2 agents improved outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01081015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.