Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271862›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2020

Plant science's next top models.

Igor Cesarino, Raffaele Dello Ioio, Gwendolyn K Kirschner, Michael S Ogden, Kelsey L Picard, Madlen I Rast-Somssich, Marc Somssich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Telomere Length Variation in Model Bryophytes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of an intermediate CPhotosynthesis research · 2022
    Review
  9. MicroRNAs expression profiles in early responses to different levels of water deficit inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Igor CesarinoDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raffaele Dello IoioDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Gwendolyn K KirschnerUniversity of Bonn, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Division of Crop Functional Genomics, Bonn, Germany.
Michael S OgdenSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kelsey L PicardSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Madlen I Rast-SomssichSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Marc SomssichSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModel organisms are at the core of life science research. Notable examples include the mouse as a model for humans, baker's yeast for eukaryotic unicellular life and simple genetics, or the enterobacteria phage λ in virology. Plant research was an exception to this rule, with researchers relying on a variety of non-model plants until the eventual adoption of Arabidopsis thaliana as primary plant model in the 1980s. This proved to be an unprecedented success, and several secondary plant models have since been established. Currently, we are experiencing another wave of expansion in the set of plant models. SCOPE: Since the 2000s, new model plants have been established to study numerous aspects of plant biology, such as the evolution of land plants, grasses, invasive and parasitic plant life, adaptation to environmental challenges, and the development of morphological diversity. Concurrent with the establishment of new plant models, the advent of the 'omics' era in biology has led to a resurgence of the more complex non-model plants. With this review, we introduce some of the new and fascinating plant models, outline why they are interesting subjects to study, the questions they will help to answer, and the molecular tools that have been established and are available to researchers.

conclusionsUnderstanding the molecular mechanisms underlying all aspects of plant biology can only be achieved with the adoption of a comprehensive set of models, each of which allows the assessment of at least one aspect of plant life. The model plants described here represent a step forward towards our goal to explore and comprehend the diversity of plant form and function. Still, several questions remain unanswered, but the constant development of novel technologies in molecular biology and bioinformatics is already paving the way for the next generation of plant models.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisAnimalsHumansMiceCardamine hirsutaEutrema salsugineumMarchantia polymorphamodel organismsnon-model plant modelsPhragmites australisPisumPlant biologyplant modelssativumSetaria viridisStriga hermonthica

Identifiers

PMID32271862
PMCPMC7304477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.