ArticlePloS one2020
Morphometric approach to 3D soft-tissue craniofacial analysis and classification of ethnicity, sex, and age.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-time and digital remote nutritional assessment framework with the use of smartphone-enabled facial morphometrics and machine learning- a proof of concept.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Morphometric analysis and spatial localization of the infraorbital foramen in adult dry human skulls: bilateral symmetry, sexual dimorphism, and accessory foramina.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional longitudinal assessment of nasal development with and without Nasoalveolar molding therapy in cleft lip and palate patients.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- A Geometric Morphometrics Approach for Predicting Olfactory Region Accessibility: Toward Personalized Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Palatal Features in Relation to Graft Harvesting in the Saudi Population.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- p75 neurotrophin receptor regulates craniofacial growth and morphology in postnatal development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Objective Diagnosis of Age-Related Soft Tissue Changes in Lower Face and Neck.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Characterization of craniofacial-based clinical phenotypes in children with suspected obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of optimal anterior-posterior position of upper incisors through ANS point: a retrospective study on a Chinese sample.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Cranial reconstruction evaluation - comparison of European statistical shape model performance on Chinese dataset.Bone reports · 2022Article
- Cranial and Odontological Methods for Sex Estimation-A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Use of Facial Morphology to Determine Nutritional Status in Older Adults: Opportunities and Challenges.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular morphology for age classification in Indonesian adolescents and adults.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe application of three-dimensional scan models offers a useful resource for studying craniofacial variation. The complex mathematical analysis for facial point acquisition in three-dimensional models has made many craniofacial assessments laborious.
methodThis study investigates three-dimensional (3D) soft-tissue craniofacial variation, with relation to ethnicity, sex and age variables in British and Irish white Europeans. This utilizes a geometric morphometric approach on a subsampled dataset comprising 292 scans, taken from a Liverpool-York Head Model database. Shape variation and analysis of each variable are tested using 20 anchor anatomical landmarks and 480 sliding semi-landmarks.
resultsSignificant ethnicity, sex, and age differences are observed for measurement covering major aspects of the craniofacial shape. The ethnicity shows subtle significant differences compared to sex and age; even though it presents the lowest classification accuracy. The magnitude of dimorphism in sex is revealed in the facial, nasal and crania measurement. Significant shape differences are also seen at each age group, with some distinct dimorphic features present in the age groups.
conclusionsThe patterns of shape variation show that white British individuals have a more rounded head shape, whereas white Irish individuals have a narrower head shape. White British persons also demonstrate higher classification accuracy. Regarding sex patterns, males are relatively larger than females, especially in the mouth and nasal regions. Females presented with higher classification accuracy than males. The differences in the chin, mouth, nose, crania, and forehead emerge from different growth rates between the groups. Classification accuracy is best for children and senior adult age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.