Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271702›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2020

Status of Beverages Served to Young Children in Child Care After Implementation of California Policy, 2012-2016.

Danielle L Lee, Klara Gurzo, Lilly A Nhan, Elyse Homel Vitale, Sallie Yoshida, Ken Hecht, Lorrene D Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle L LeeUniversity of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, Berkeley, California.
Klara GurzoUniversity of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, Berkeley, California.
Lilly A NhanUniversity of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, Berkeley, California.
Elyse Homel VitaleCalifornia Food Policy Advocates, Oakland, California.
Sallie YoshidaThe Sarah Samuels Center for Public Health Research and Evaluation, Oakland, California.
Ken HechtUniversity of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, Berkeley, California.
Lorrene D RitchieUniversity of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, 2115 Milvia St, Suite 301, Berkeley, CA, 94704. Email: lritchie@ucanr.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince 2012, licensed California child care centers and homes, per state policy, are required to serve only unflavored low-fat or nonfat milk to children aged 2 years or older, no more than one serving of 100% juice daily, and no beverages with added sweeteners, and they are required to ensure that drinking water is readily accessible throughout the day. We evaluated adherence to the policy after 4 years in comparison to the adherence evaluation conducted shortly after the policy went into effect.

methodsLicensed California child care sites were randomly selected in 2012 and 2016 and surveyed about beverage practices and provisions to children aged 1-5 years. We used logistic regression to analyze between-year differences for all sites combined and within-year differences by site type and participation in the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) in self-reported policy adherence and beverage provisions.

resultsRespondents in 2016 (n = 680), compared with those in 2012 (n = 435), were more adherent to California's 2010 Healthy Beverages in Child Care Act overall (45.1% vs 27.2%, P < .001) and with individual provisions for milk (65.0% vs 41.4%, P < .001), 100% juice (91.2% vs 81.5%, P < .001), and sugar-sweetened beverages (97.4% vs 93.4%, P = .006). In 2016, centers compared with homes (48.5% vs 28.0%, P = .001) and CACFP sites compared with non-CACFP sites (51.6% vs 27.9%, P < .001) were more adherent to AB2084 overall. DISCUSSION: Beverage policy adherence in California child care has improved since 2012 and is higher in CACFP sites and centers. Additional policy promotion and implementation support is encouraged for non-CACFP sites and homes. Other states should consider adopting such policies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeveragesCaliforniaChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantLogistic ModelsNutrition PolicySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32271702
PMCPMC7207061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.