Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271655›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Vaccination during pregnancy: Canadian maternity care providers' opinions and practices.

Eve Dubé, Dominique Gagnon, Kyla Kaminsky, Courtney R Green, Manale Ouakki, Julie A Bettinger, Nicholas Brousseau, Eliana Castillo, Natasha S Crowcroft, S Michelle Driedger and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Eve DubéDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1336-1510
Dominique GagnonDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.
Kyla KaminskySociety of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada.
Courtney R GreenSociety of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7870-0969
Manale OuakkiDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.
Julie A BettingerVaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-4174
Nicholas BrousseauDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.
Eliana CastilloCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada.
Natasha S CrowcroftPublic Health Ontario, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-8783
S Michelle DriedgerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Canada.
Devon GreysonVaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada.
Deshayne FellSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada.
William FisherDepartment of Psychology, Western University , London, Canada.
Arnaud GagneurDépartement des soins de santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Canada.
Maryse GuayDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-2224
Donna HalperinSchool of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University , Antigonish, Canada.
Scott A HalperinDepartment of Pediatrics, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre , Halifax, Canada.
Shannon MacDonaldFaculty of Nursing, School of Public Health, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4675-4433
Samantha B MeyerSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-2828
Nancy M WaiteDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3440-9843
Kumanan WilsonOttawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Canada.
Holly O WittemanDépartement de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval , Québec, Canada.
Mark YudinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada.
Jocelynn L CookSociety of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada.
Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CADalhousie University · CAOttawa Hospital · CASt. Francis Xavier University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of countries have implemented vaccination in pregnancy as a strategy to reduce the burden of influenza and pertussis. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of Canadian maternity care providers in administration of vaccines to their pregnant patients. A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to family physicians, obstetricians-gynecologists, midwives, pharmacists, and nurses. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine variables independently associated with offering vaccination services in pregnancy in providers' practice. A total of 1,135 participants participated. Overall, 64% (n = 724) of the participants reported offering vaccines in their practice and 56% (n = 632) reported offering vaccines to pregnant patients. The main reasons reported for not offering vaccination services in pregnancy were the belief that vaccination was outside of the scope of practice; logistical issues around access to vaccines; or lack of staff to administer vaccines. In multivariable analysis, the main factors associated with vaccination of pregnant patients in practices where vaccination services were offered were: providers' confidence in counseling pregnant patients about vaccines, seeing fewer than 11 pregnant patients on average each week, and being a nurse or a family physician. Although the majority of participants expressed strong support for vaccination during pregnancy, half were not offering vaccination services in their practice. Many were not equipped to offer vaccines in their practice or felt that it was not their role to do so. To enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake in pregnancy, it will be important to address the logistical barriers identified in this study.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaternal Health ServicesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyVaccinationInfluenza Vaccinesattitudes and practiceshealth care providersImmunizationimmunization servicesknowledgepertussisprenatal care

Identifiers

PMID32271655
PMCPMC7733901
OpenAlexW3016198182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.