Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271512›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Urologist's clinical practice in Brazil: a management guideline proposal for low- and middle-income countries during the crisis period.

Arie Carneiro, Marcelo Langer Wroclawski, Bruno Nahar, Andrey Soares, Ana Paula Cardoso, Nam Jin Kim, Fabricio Torres Carvalho

Abstract readLectureLetter
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Urological complications of COVID-19: a systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The impact of delaying acute kidney stone surgery on outcomes.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  12. The Impact of COVID-19 Disease on Urology Practice.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Consideration in the management of renal cell carcinoma during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arie CarneiroDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcelo Langer WroclawskiDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Bruno NaharDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA.
Andrey SoaresDepartamento de Oncologia Médica, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ana Paula CardosoDepartamento de Oncologia Médica, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Nam Jin KimChefe do Programa de Cirurgia e Cirurgia Robótica, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fabricio Torres CarvalhoDepartamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This letter to the Editor aims to provide suggestions and recommendations for the management of urological conditions in times of COVID-19 crisis in Brazil and other low- and middle-income countries. It is important to highlight that one of the main characteristics of this pandemic is the oversaturation of the health system capacity, mostly due to a high demand for personal protective equipment (PPE), Hospital/ICU beds, as well as ventilators. In places with limited resources and where the health care systems are already saturated, such consideration is even more worrisome. Therefore, most worldwide authorities are recommending to avoid, as much as possible, patient's elective visits to hospitals, as well as a judicious use of the operating room in order to mitigate the strain put on the health system. While efforts should be directed to the care of COVID-19 patients, other conditions (especially urgencies and oncological cases) must continue to be assisted. Thus, through a panel of experts, we have prepared a practical guide for Thus, through a panel of experts, we have prepared a practical guide for urologists based on the recommendations from the main Urologic Associations, as well as data from the literature to support the suggested management. We will try to follow the standard guideline recommendations from the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU), with the aim of pursuing the best outcomes possible. However, some recommendations were based on the consensus of the panel, taking into consideration the reality of developing countries and the unprecedented situation caused by the COVID-19 crisis. Most importantly, all recommendations on this manuscript are based on the expectancy of a maximum 3-month duration of the crisis. If this period shall extended, these recommendations will be revised and updated.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBrazilCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralPractice Patterns, Physicians'SARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUrologists

Identifiers

PMID32271512
PMCPMC7239291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.