Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271510›Full record

SynthesisInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Partial nephrectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes and better renal function preservation than radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Huan Deng, Yan Fan, Feifei Yuan, Li Wang, Zhengdong Hong, Jinfeng Zhan, Wenxiong Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [A retrospective matching study of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a stage renal cell carcinoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Predicting the 3-year tumor-specific survival in patients with TBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Robotic PartialJournal of endourology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large complex renal cancer: step-by-step segmental artery unclamping.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  15. Partial laparoscopic nephrectomy: what really matters?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  16. Article
  17. How to draw the line between partial and radical nephrectomy.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  18. Practical evaluation of the R.E.N.A.L. score system in 150 laparoscopic nephron sparing surgeries.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  19. A novel nomogram can predict pathological T3a upstaged from clinical T1a in localized renal cell carcinoma.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  20. A decisive year to International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huan DengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yan FanDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Feifei YuanDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Li WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhengdong HongDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jinfeng ZhanDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenxiong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadical nephrectomy (RN) is the standard surgical type for pathological stage T3a (pT3a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recently, some studies have suggested equivalence between partial nephrectomy (PN) and RN for oncologic control and have shown the benefits of PN for better renal function. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes, perioperative outcomes and renal function between two groups among patients with pT3a RCC. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar were searched for eligible articles. The endpoints of the final analysis included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), surgical complications, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

resultsTwelve studies of moderate to high quality, including 14.152 patients, were examined. PN showed superiority for renal functional preservation, providing higher eGFR (WMD=12.48mL/min; 95%CI: 10.28 to 14.67; P < 0.00001) and lower serum creatinine (WMD=-0.31mg/dL; 95%CI: -0.40 to -0.21; P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between PN and RN regarding operative time, EBL, surgical complications, OS, RFS and CSS. Despite inherent selection bias, most pooled estimates were consistent in sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. More positive margins were found in the PN group (RR=2.42; 95%CI: 1.25-4.68; P=0.009).

conclusionsPN may be more suitable for treating pT3a RCC than RN because it provides a similar survival time (OS or RFS) and superior renal function. Nevertheless, this result is still disputed, and more high-quality studies are required.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMargins of ExcisionNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCarcinoma, Renal CellMeta-Analysis [Publication Type]Nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32271510
PMCPMC7712695
OpenAlexW3015628656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.