Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32271314›Full record

ArticleBlood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis2020

Real-world outcomes associated with standard half-life and extended half-life factor replacement products for treatment of haemophilia A and B.

Amit Chhabra, Dean Spurden, Patrick F Fogarty, Bartholomew J Tortella, Emily Rubinstein, Simon Harris, Andreas M Pleil, Jennifer Mellor, Jonathan de Courcy, José Alvir

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Literature Review of Outcomes Associated With Adherence to Haemophilia Drug Therapy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. A precision gene-engineered B cell medicine producing sustained levels of active factor IX for hemophilia B therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human plasma cells engineered to secrete bispecifics drive effective in vivo leukemia killing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Clinical Genetics of Hemophilia B (Factor IX Deficiency).The application of clinical genetics · 2021
    Review
  16. HAEMFIX: Impact of Switching From SHL-FIX to EHL-FIX in Patients With Haemophilia B.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
    Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit ChhabraPfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA.
Dean SpurdenPfizer Limited, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Patrick F FogartyPfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bartholomew J TortellaPfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Emily RubinsteinPfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA.
Simon HarrisPfizer Limited, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Andreas M PleilPfizer Inc, San Diego, California, USA.
Jennifer MellorAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Jonathan de CourcyAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
José AlvirPfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USAdelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Standard-of-care treatment for haemophilia A or B is to maintain adequate coagulation factor levels through clotting factor administration. The current study aimed to evaluate annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and treatment adherence for haemophilia A or B patients receiving standard half-life (SHL) vs. extended half-life (EHL) factor replacement products. We analysed data from the Adelphi Disease-Specific Programmes, a health record-based survey of United States and European haematologists. Analysis included 651 males with moderate-to-severe haemophilia A or B (the United States, n = 132; Europe, n = 519). The haemophilia A analysis included 501 patients (SHL, n = 435; EHL, n = 66). In the combined United States/European population, mean (SD) ABR was 1.7 (1.69) for the SHL group and 1.8 (2.00) for the EHL group. A total of 72% of patients receiving SHL factor VIII and 75% of patients receiving EHL factor VIII in the combined population were fully adherent (no doses missed of the last 10 doses), as reported by physicians. The haemophilia B analysis included 150 patients (SHL, n = 114; EHL, n = 36). The mean (SD) ABR in the combined population was 2.1 (2.16) for patients receiving SHL factor IX (FIX) and 1.4 (1.48) for patients receiving EHL FIX. The percentage of fully adherent patients (physician-reported) was similar in both treatment groups (SHL FIX, 68%; EHL FIX, 73%). In this preliminary real-world survey in a relatively small sample of patients, measures of ABR and adherence between SHL and EHL products were evaluated. Additional real-world research on prescribing patterns, SHL vs. EHL effectiveness, and adherence is warranted.

Indexed as

Half-LifeFemaleHemophilia AHemophilia BHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32271314
PMCPMC7195855
OpenAlexW3015735559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.