Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270965›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2020

Twenty-Five Years of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Structural Observations and Impact on Graft Performance.

Ninos Samano, Domingos Souza, Bruno Botelho Pinheiro, Tomislav Kopjar, Michael Dashwood

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The SWEDEGRAFT Saphenous Vein Trial: A Study of No-Touch vs. Nordic Grafts?Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Great Saphenous Vein Lumen: Intimal Openings.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Clinical Utility of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafting as a Second Conduit in Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. External stenting for saphenous vein grafts reduces early postoperative graft failure.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ninos SamanoÖrebro University Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro Sweden Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Domingos SouzaÖrebro University Faculty of Medicine and Health Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Örebro Sweden Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Bruno Botelho PinheiroHospital do Coração Anis Rassi Department Cardiovascular Surgery Goiânia GO Brazil Department Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital do Coração Anis Rassi, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Tomislav KopjarUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb University of Zagreb School of Medicine Department of Cardiac Surgery Zagreb Croatia Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Zagreb School of Medicine and University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Michael DashwoodUniversity College London Medical School Royal Free Hospital Campus Surgical and Interventional Sciences London UK Surgical and Interventional Sciences, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
Örebro University · SEUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The saphenous vein is the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) yet its failure rate is higher compared to arterial grafts. An improvement in saphenous vein graft performance is therefore a major priority in CABG. No-touch harvesting of the saphenous vein is one of the few interventions that has shown improved patency rates, comparable to that of the left internal thoracic artery. After more than two decades of no-touch research, this technique is now recognized as a Class IIa recommendation in the 2018 European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization. In this review, we describe the structural alterations that occur in conventional versus no-touch saphenous vein grafts and how these changes affect graft patency. In addition, we discuss various strategies aimed at repairing saphenous vein grafts prepared at conventional CABG.

Indexed as

Mammary ArteriesSaphenous VeinCoronary Artery BypassHumansTreatment OutcomeVascular PatencyCardiologyCoronary Artery BypassGuidelinesMammary ArteriesMyocardial RevascularizationSaphenous Vein

Identifiers

PMID32270965
PMCPMC7089755
OpenAlexW3007671525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.