Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270421›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of a Cooperative Group Trial on Radiation Use and Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Older Women.

Jessica Keim-Malpass, Roger T Anderson, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Raj P Desai, Shayna L Showalter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica Keim-MalpassSchool of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Jlk2t@virginia.edu.
Roger T AndersonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rajesh BalkrishnanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Raj P DesaiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Shayna L ShowalterDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
Postdoctoral Training Grant for MDs in Surgical Oncology ResearchT32CA163177 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Craig Lee Slingluff, Allan Tsung · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing long-term survival data from the C9343 trial as a temporal reference point, this study aimed to determine radiation therapy (RT) treatment trends for older patients with early-stage breast cancer. The study also examined rates of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).

methodsThe surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2007 through 2016. Bivariate associations were calculated to determine variable characteristics by time frame (group 1: 2007-2012 vs. group 2: 2013-2016). Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of group on the RT use and AET adherence. The temporal rates for both RT and AET adherence over time were plotted.

resultsThe final study cohort included 12,210 Medicare beneficiaries. Use of RT differed significantly between the groups, with a higher proportion omitting RT in the later period (25% of group 2 vs. 20% of group 1; p < 0.001). In both groups, after adjustment for covariates, the patients with RT omitted were statistically less likely to adhere to AET [group 1: odds ratio (OR), 0.74; p < 0.001 vs. group 2: OR, 0.66; p < 0.001].

conclusionThis study, 15 years after publication of the of the C9343 trial results, showed minimal change in practice, with most older women receiving RT. Importantly, AET adherence was significantly lower in the non-RT group. For women who meet the criteria to have adjuvant RT omitted, nonadherence to AET could result in undertreatment of their breast cancer, and RT should not be considered overtreatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDrug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMedicareRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSEER ProgramUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID32270421
PMCPMC12038951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.