ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021
[Medical ID and emergency apps: A useful tool in emergency situations or a waste of time?]
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn order to provide safe care to a patient in an emergency situation, it is useful to know something about the patient's previous medical conditions and medication. For this very reason smartphones have been equipped with so-called emergency apps (e.g. medical-ID, emergency-ID). The aim of our study was to find out whether the owners of smartphones are using the apps and whether medical professionals are trying to access this information.
methodsWe conducted a survey among patients in our outpatient clinic at a level one trauma center. We collected data over 3 months regarding the usage behavior of the aforementioned apps. We simultaneously asked emergency physicians at various hospitals about their experiences with these apps.
resultsWe were able to interview 192 patients and 103 emergency physicians. The emergency apps were unknown to 45% (n = 79) of the respondents; only 10% (n = 19) of the respondents had the app with data stored. Furthermore, it was found that a total of 21% (n = 41) of the persons carried a note on themselves with previous illnesses and medication. Of the surveyed physicians, 42% (n = 44) stated that they had heard of the app before; however, only 6% (n = 5) routinely searched the smartphone for relevant information in the case of nonresponsive patients. Only 14% of physicians (n = 14) have successfully used the app so far.
conclusionThe collected data show that the emergency apps are still unknown to many patients and emergency physicians alike. Due to the low distribution it does not seem to be recommendable to search the smartphone for the apps in time-critical situations after accidents. For patients over 55 years of age, it currently seems more promising to search their wallets for information regarding their previous illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.