ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020
[Musculoskeletal disorders among urologists-is there an association with open pelvic surgery? : Results of a national survey].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn urology, the health implications of open pelvic surgery (OPS) on the patient have been the subject of numerous studies. However, health effects on the surgeon have not yet been sufficiently considered. The present study investigates the relationship between musculoskeletal disorders in urological surgeons and their activity in OPS. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom the point of view of occupational physiology, exemplary operations in OPS were examined using the key indicator method (KIM). In addition, a web-based survey among German clinicians was carried out. From the collected variables, models for the prediction of the endpoints pain and disc herniation (DH) were generated by multivariate logistic regression.
resultsRisk assessment of the operations with KIM could show that OPS presents a significantly increased physical workload and thus potential physical overstraining. Of the 605 participants in the survey, 35.4% were urologists performing OPS, 32.0% were urologists not performing OPS and 32.6% were gastroenterologists (control groups). Activity in OPS had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.09 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.66, p = 0.69) for predicting pain, and an OR of 1.14 for prediction of DH CI: 0.66-1.94; p = 0.64). Statistically significant factors influencing the perception of pain were BMI, gender and work ability index (WAI), whereas age and WAI were significant for the occurrence of DH.
conclusionOur survey could not show that surgeons practicing OPS have a significantly increased rate of musculoskeletal disorders or, in particular, an increased rate of DH in comparison to the control groups. Nevertheless, the rate of reported complaints among all clinicians surveyed is high, and the random risk assessment of the examplary OPS operations could also demonstrate the risk of physical overstraining. Further considerations should therefore be made as to how reduce the strain on the musculoskeletal system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.